ReviewFrontiers in plant science2018
Opportunities for Innovation in Genetic Transformation of Forest Trees.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Fruit-Pulp-Derived Callus-Level Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Platform forPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrated transcriptomic and physiological analysis reveals cadmium stress responses in kiwifruit rootstockFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Walnut genome editing: an optimized CRISPR/Cas9 platform with superior genotypes and endogenous promoters.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Poplar transformation with variable explant sources to maximize transformation efficiency.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Developmental regulatory genes in recalcitrant forest trees: advances in somatic regeneration and genetic transformation.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Article
- GWAS supported by computer vision identifies large numbers of candidate regulators of in planta regeneration in Populus trichocarpa.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Genetic transformation in conifers: current status and future prospects.Forestry research · 2024Review
- Optimization of Protocols for the Induction of Callus and Plant Regeneration in White Clover (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Establishment of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system to Juglans sigillata Dode 'Qianhe-7'.Transgenic research · 2023Article
- The wound-activated ERF15 transcription factor drivesScience advances · 2022Article
- Genotype-independent plant transformation.Horticulture research · 2022Article
- Current status and trends in forest genomics.Forestry research · 2022Review
- Genetic transformation of legumes: an update.Plant cell reports · 2021Review
- RNAi of AGAMOUS genes in sweetgum alters reproductive organ identity and decreases fruit persistence.Plant direct · 2020Article
- DNA Methylation Silences Exogenous Gene Expression in Transgenic Birch Progeny.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Overexpression of the Transcription FactorFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Perspectives of CRISPR/Cas-mediatedHorticulture research · 2020Review
- Using Morphogenic Genes to Improve Recovery and Regeneration of Transgenic Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Plant Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology: Following Mariotti's Steps.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incorporation of DNA into plant genomes followed by regeneration of non-chimeric stable plants (transformation) remains a major challenge for most plant species. Forest trees are particularly difficult as a result of their biochemistry, aging, desire for clonal fidelity, delayed reproduction, and high diversity. We review two complementary approaches to transformation that appear to hold promise for forest trees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.