ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018
Cognitive Load Affects Numerical and Temporal Judgments in Distinct Ways.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neural networks underlying magnitude perception: a specific meta-analysis of fMRI studies.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Pooled it
- Presentation of numerical uncertainty modulates duration judgments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Symmetrical and asymmetrical distortions in time and numerosity perception induced by chunked stimuli.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Top-down determinants of the numerosity-time interaction.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Investigation of frequency components embedded in EEG recordings underlying neuronal mechanism of cognitive control and attentional functions.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Estimation Strategy Utilization Is Modulated by Implicit Emotion Regulation: Evidence from Behavioral and Event-Related Potentials Studies.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Can a Common Magnitude System Theory Explain the Brain Representation of Space, Time, and Number?Noro psikiyatri arsivi · 2022Review
- Number-time interaction: Search for a common magnitude system in a cross-modal setting.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Attention mediates the influence of numerical magnitude on temporal processing.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- "Time Slows Down Whenever You Are Around" for Women but Not for Men.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- A Revised Framework for the Investigation of Expectation Update Versus Maintenance in the Context of Expectation Violations: The ViolEx 2.0 Model.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Numerical Magnitude Affects Accuracy but Not Precision of Temporal Judgments.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Number, time, and space are not singularly represented: Evidence against a common magnitude system beyond early childhood.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prominent theories suggest that time and number are processed by a single neural locus or a common magnitude system (e.g., Meck and Church, 1983; Walsh, 2003). However, a growing body of literature has identified numerous inconsistencies between temporal and numerical processing, casting doubt on the presence of such a singular system. Findings of distinct temporal and numerical biases in the presence of emotional content (Baker et al., 2013; Young and Cordes, 2013) are particularly relevant to this debate. Specifically, emotional stimuli lead to temporal
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.