Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30333736›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2018

Investigation of the Pattern of the Hemodynamic Response as Measured by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Studies in Newborns, Less Than a Month Old: A Systematic Review.

Isabel de Roever, Gemma Bale, Subhabrata Mitra, Judith Meek, Nicola J Robertson, Ilias Tachtsidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Comparing different pre-processing routines for infant fNIRS data.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  20. Regional Haemodynamic and Metabolic Coupling in Infants.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isabel de RoeverDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Gemma BaleDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Subhabrata MitraDepartment of Neonatology, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Judith MeekDepartment of Neonatology, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicola J RobertsonDepartment of Neonatology, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ilias TachtsidisDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been 20 years since functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was first used to investigate the evoked hemodynamic response to a stimulus in newborns. The hemodynamic response to functional activation is well-established in adults, with an observed increase in concentration change of oxygenated hemoglobin (Δ[HbO

Indexed as

brain activityfunctional activationhemodynamic responseinfantnear-infrared spectroscopyneurovascular couplingnewbornsstimulus

Identifiers

PMID30333736
PMCPMC6176492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.