Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30333574›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Growth and longevity in giant barrel sponges: Redwoods of the reef or Pines in the Indo-Pacific?

Emily C McGrath, Lisa Woods, Jamaluddin Jompa, Abdul Haris, James J Bell

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily C McGrathSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand. emily.mcgrath@vuw.ac.nz.
Lisa WoodsSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand.
Jamaluddin JompaResearch and Development Centre on Marine, Coastal and Small Islands, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Abdul HarisResearch and Development Centre on Marine, Coastal and Small Islands, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
James J BellSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9996-945X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Describing life history dynamics of functionally important species is critical for successful management. Barrel sponges (Xestospongia spp.) fill ecologically important roles on coral reefs due to their large size and water column interactions. Studies of Caribbean X. muta suggest they may be up to 1000 s of years old. However, nothing is known of barrel sponge growth rates outside the Caribbean. We assessed Indo-Pacific barrel sponge demography with a focus on specific growth rate (SGR), density, and mean volume across four sites of varying habitat quality. Four growth models were compared using Akaike's Information Criterion using a multi-model inference approach. Age was extrapolated and validated based on sponge size on a shipwreck of known age. Sponges from different sites showed differences in density, volume gained, and mean volume, but not growth rates. Interestingly, SGRs were slightly slower than that of X. muta, yet growth models supported rapid growth; Indo-Pacific sponges were over twice as old as published estimates of comparably sized X. muta (53-55 as compared to 23 years of age, respectively), although extrapolation errors are likely to increase with sponge size. This suggests that barrel sponge growth rates in the Indo-Pacific might be more comparable to Pines rather than Redwoods.

Indexed as

LongevityAnimalsCoral ReefsEcosystemIndian OceanPacific OceanXestospongia

Identifiers

PMID30333574
PMCPMC6193018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.