Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30333494›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Targeting SPINK1 in the damaged tumour microenvironment alleviates therapeutic resistance.

Fei Chen, Qilai Long, Da Fu, Dexiang Zhu, Yan Ji, Liu Han, Boyi Zhang, Qixia Xu, Bingjie Liu, Yan Li and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Fei ChenKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumour, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Qilai LongDepartment of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Da FuCentral Laboratory for Medical Research, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0878-2575
Dexiang ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yan JiKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumour, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Liu HanKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumour, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Boyi ZhangKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumour, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Qixia XuInstitute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine & Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Bingjie LiuFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center & Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Cancer Institutes, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yan LiKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumour, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Shanshan WuKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumour, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Chen YangKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumour, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Min QianKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumour, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3410-1753
Jianmin XuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Suling LiuFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center & Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Cancer Institutes, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Liu CaoKey Laboratory of Medical Cell Biology, China Medical University, Shenyang, 110122, China.
Y Eugene ChinInstitute of Biology and Medical Sciences, Soochow University Medical College, 199 Renai Road, Suzhou, 215123, Jiangsu, China.
Eric W-F LamDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-3576
Jean-Philippe CoppéDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA.
Yu SunKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumour, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China. sunyu@sibs.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7121-9112
Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNChina Medical University · CNImperial College London · GBShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNSoochow University · CNTongji University · CNUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy and radiation not only trigger cancer cell apoptosis but also damage stromal cells in the tumour microenvironment (TME), inducing a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) characterized by chronic secretion of diverse soluble factors. Here we report serine protease inhibitor Kazal type I (SPINK1), a SASP factor produced in human stromal cells after genotoxic treatment. DNA damage causes SPINK1 expression by engaging NF-κB and C/EBP, while paracrine SPINK1 promotes cancer cell aggressiveness particularly chemoresistance. Strikingly, SPINK1 reprograms the expression profile of cancer cells, causing prominent epithelial-endothelial transition (EET), a phenotypic switch mediated by EGFR signaling but hitherto rarely reported for a SASP factor. In vivo, SPINK1 is expressed in the stroma of solid tumours and is routinely detectable in peripheral blood of cancer patients after chemotherapy. Our study substantiates SPINK1 as both a targetable SASP factor and a novel noninvasive biomarker of therapeutically damaged TME for disease control and clinical surveillance.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceDrug Resistance, NeoplasmTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkersCell Line, TumorDNA DamageHumansNF-kappa BParacrine CommunicationPhenotypeTranscriptomeTrypsin Inhibitor, Kazal PancreaticBiomarkersNF-kappa BSPINK1 protein, humanTrypsin Inhibitor, Kazal Pancreatic

Identifiers

PMID30333494
PMCPMC6193001
OpenAlexW2897749150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.