Observational studyJCI insight2018
Exploring the cardiac response to injury in heart transplant biopsies.
Observational study in JCI insight, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02670408 (Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications of Microarrays in Heart Transplantation, a Multicenter Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications of Microarrays in Heart Transplantation, a Multicenter Study (INTERHEART)
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic cellular programs of human cardiac allograft rejection revealed by spatial transcriptomics.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Article
- From the Bench to the Bedside and Back: Contemporary Applications of Basic Science to Innovations in Heart Transplantation.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2026Review
- Proteomics in Acute Heart Transplant Rejection, on Behalf of the GRAfT Investigators.Transplantation · 2025Article
- Core signature of rejection-associated cytokines and chemokines in endomyocardial biopsies after heart transplantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Precision diagnostics in transplanted organs using microarray-assessed gene expression: concepts and technical methods of the Molecular Microscope® Diagnostic System (MMDx).Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2024Review
- Exploring personalized treatment for cardiac graft rejection based on a four-archetype analysis model and bioinformatics analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The evolving use of biomarkers in heart transplantation: Consensus of an expert panel.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023Review
- A Review of Biomarkers of Cardiac Allograft Rejection: Toward an Integrated Diagnosis of Rejection.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Cardiac Allograft Injuries: A Review of Approaches to a Common Dilemma, With Emphasis on Emerging Techniques.International journal of heart failure · 2022Review
- Deep learning-enabled assessment of cardiac allograft rejection from endomyocardial biopsies.Nature medicine · 2022Article
- Transcriptomic heterogeneity of antibody mediated rejection after heart transplant with or without donor specific antibodies.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2021Article
- Investigation of hub genes and immune status in heart transplant rejection using endomyocardial biopsies.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Article
- The Impact of Inflammation on the Immune Responses to Transplantation: Tolerance or Rejection?Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Untangling Local Pro-Inflammatory, Reparative, and Regulatory Damage-Associated Molecular-Patterns (DAMPs) Pathways to Improve Transplant Outcomes.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- The evolution of patient-specific precision biomarkers to guide personalized heart-transplant care.Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2021Article
- Multi-gene technical assessment of qPCR and NanoString n-Counter analysis platforms in cynomolgus monkey cardiac allograft recipients.Cellular immunology · 2020Article
- Single-cell Transcriptomics and Solid Organ Transplantation.Transplantation · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBecause injury is universal in organ transplantation, heart transplant endomyocardial biopsies present an opportunity to explore response to injury in heart parenchyma. Histology has limited ability to assess injury, potentially confusing it with rejection, whereas molecular changes have potential to distinguish injury from rejection. Building on previous studies of transcripts associated with T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), we explored transcripts reflecting injury.
methodsMicroarray data from 889 prospectively collected endomyocardial biopsies from 454 transplant recipients at 14 centers were subjected to unsupervised principal component analysis and archetypal analysis to detect variation not explained by rejection. The resulting principal component and archetype scores were then examined for their transcript, transcript set, and pathway associations and compared to the histology diagnoses and left ventricular function.
resultsRejection was reflected by principal components PC1 and PC2, and by archetype scores S2TCMR, and S3ABMR, with S1normal indicating normalness. PC3 and a new archetype score, S4injury, identified unexplained variation correlating with expression of transcripts inducible in injury models, many expressed in macrophages and associated with inflammation in pathway analysis. S4injury scores were high in recent transplants, reflecting donation-implantation injury, and both S4injury and S2TCMR were associated with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
conclusionAssessment of injury is necessary for accurate estimates of rejection and for understanding heart transplant phenotypes. Biopsies with molecular injury but no molecular rejection were often misdiagnosed rejection by histology.TRAIL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02670408FUNDING. Roche Organ Transplant Research Foundation, the University of Alberta Hospital Foundation, and Alberta Health Services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.