Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30333303›Full record

Observational studyJCI insight2018

Exploring the cardiac response to injury in heart transplant biopsies.

Philip F Halloran, Jeff Reeve, Arezu Z Aliabadi, Martin Cadeiras, Marisa G Crespo-Leiro, Mario Deng, Eugene C Depasquale, Johannes Goekler, Xavier Jouven, Daniel H Kim and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JCI insight, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02670408 (Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications of Microarrays in Heart Transplantation, a Multicenter Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02670408 recruitingnot on this map

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications of Microarrays in Heart Transplantation, a Multicenter Study (INTERHEART)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2016 to 2028Enrolled900ConditionsCardiac Transplant DisorderArmsEndomyocardial biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The evolving use of biomarkers in heart transplantation: Consensus of an expert panel.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Transcriptomic heterogeneity of antibody mediated rejection after heart transplant with or without donor specific antibodies.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Philip F HalloranAlberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jeff ReeveAlberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Arezu Z AliabadiMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin CadeirasRonald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Marisa G Crespo-LeiroComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Mario DengRonald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Eugene C DepasqualeRonald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Johannes GoeklerMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Xavier JouvenParis Transplant Group, Paris, France.
Daniel H KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jon KobashigawaCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calfornia, USA.
Alexandre LoupyHôpital Necker, Paris, France.
Peter MacdonaldThe Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Luciano PotenaCardiovascular Department, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Andreas ZuckermannMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael D ParkesAlberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Medical University of Vienna · ATRonald Reagan UCLA Medical Center · USUniversity of Alberta · CACedars-Sinai Medical Center · USComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRThe Metabolomics Innovation Centre · CAUniversity of Bologna · ITVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause injury is universal in organ transplantation, heart transplant endomyocardial biopsies present an opportunity to explore response to injury in heart parenchyma. Histology has limited ability to assess injury, potentially confusing it with rejection, whereas molecular changes have potential to distinguish injury from rejection. Building on previous studies of transcripts associated with T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), we explored transcripts reflecting injury.

methodsMicroarray data from 889 prospectively collected endomyocardial biopsies from 454 transplant recipients at 14 centers were subjected to unsupervised principal component analysis and archetypal analysis to detect variation not explained by rejection. The resulting principal component and archetype scores were then examined for their transcript, transcript set, and pathway associations and compared to the histology diagnoses and left ventricular function.

resultsRejection was reflected by principal components PC1 and PC2, and by archetype scores S2TCMR, and S3ABMR, with S1normal indicating normalness. PC3 and a new archetype score, S4injury, identified unexplained variation correlating with expression of transcripts inducible in injury models, many expressed in macrophages and associated with inflammation in pathway analysis. S4injury scores were high in recent transplants, reflecting donation-implantation injury, and both S4injury and S2TCMR were associated with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.

conclusionAssessment of injury is necessary for accurate estimates of rejection and for understanding heart transplant phenotypes. Biopsies with molecular injury but no molecular rejection were often misdiagnosed rejection by histology.TRAIL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02670408FUNDING. Roche Organ Transplant Research Foundation, the University of Alberta Hospital Foundation, and Alberta Health Services.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiopsyChildChild, PreschoolEndocardiumFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGraft RejectionHeart InjuriesHeart TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumCardiologyInnate immunityMolecular diagnosisOrgan transplantationTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID30333303
PMCPMC6237487
OpenAlexW2895956107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.