ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018
Fire spread and the issue of community-level selection in the evolution of flammability.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying the environmental limits to fire spread in grassy ecosystems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Increased aridity drives post-fire recovery of Mediterranean forests towards open shrublands.The New phytologist · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whether plants can evolve to promote flammability is controversial. Ecologically, fire only spreads in landscapes when many plants are flammable, but collective behaviours among large groups are difficult to evolve at the individual level. Here, we formulate a model that examines how flammability can spread from rarity, combining individual-level costs and payoffs of flammability with landscape-level fire spread, sufficiently generic to analogize flammability among grasses, Mediterranean systems, and others. We found that fire-prone and fire-suppressing landscapes, composed of flammable and non-flammable plants, respectively, were alternatively stable in some environments, and flammability therefore only increased from rarity in environments when fire-proneness was the only stable state. Thus, fire-vegetation feedbacks alone probably did not drive the evolution and spread of flammability. However, evolution of flammability did promote fire-proneness in temporally and spatially heterogeneous environments: when flammable plants already occupied some substantial fraction of a fire-prone landscape, a positive feedback with fire could maintain flammability in a decreasingly favourable environment, and fire feedbacks could expand the distribution of flammability traits from fire-prone into fire-suppressing areas in a heterogeneous landscape. Thus, fire feedbacks could potentially have promoted the widespread invasion and persistence of flammability traits to their current widespread prominence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.