Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30333245›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018

Fire spread and the issue of community-level selection in the evolution of flammability.

Emmanuel Schertzer, A Carla Staver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quantifying the environmental limits to fire spread in grassy ecosystems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emmanuel SchertzerLaboratoire de Probabilités et Modèles Aléatoires, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
A Carla StaverDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA carla.staver@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2384-675X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether plants can evolve to promote flammability is controversial. Ecologically, fire only spreads in landscapes when many plants are flammable, but collective behaviours among large groups are difficult to evolve at the individual level. Here, we formulate a model that examines how flammability can spread from rarity, combining individual-level costs and payoffs of flammability with landscape-level fire spread, sufficiently generic to analogize flammability among grasses, Mediterranean systems, and others. We found that fire-prone and fire-suppressing landscapes, composed of flammable and non-flammable plants, respectively, were alternatively stable in some environments, and flammability therefore only increased from rarity in environments when fire-proneness was the only stable state. Thus, fire-vegetation feedbacks alone probably did not drive the evolution and spread of flammability. However, evolution of flammability did promote fire-proneness in temporally and spatially heterogeneous environments: when flammable plants already occupied some substantial fraction of a fire-prone landscape, a positive feedback with fire could maintain flammability in a decreasingly favourable environment, and fire feedbacks could expand the distribution of flammability traits from fire-prone into fire-suppressing areas in a heterogeneous landscape. Thus, fire feedbacks could potentially have promoted the widespread invasion and persistence of flammability traits to their current widespread prominence.

Indexed as

EcosystemFiresModels, BiologicalPlantsBiological Evolutioncollective behaviourevolutionarily stable strategyevolution of cooperationflammabilitypercolation

Identifiers

PMID30333245
PMCPMC6228483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.