Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30333029›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2018

Field assessment of potential sugar feeding stations for disseminating bacteria in a paratransgenic approach to control malaria.

Etienne Bilgo, Amélie Vantaux, Antoine Sanon, Seni Ilboudo, Roch K Dabiré, Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena, Abdoulaye Diabate

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. NovelFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Etienne BilgoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. bilgo02@yahoo.fr.
Amélie VantauxInstitut Pasteur of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Antoine SanonLaboratoire d'Entomologie Fondamentale et Appliqué/UFR-SVT/Université Ouaga I, Pr. Joseph KI-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Seni IlboudoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Roch K DabiréInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Marcelo Jacobs-LorenaDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Abdoulaye DiabateInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.

Funding

Targeting mosquito organs with phage display librariesR01AI031478 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JACOBS-LORENA, MARCELO · 1991 to 2018
$6.0M
Ministère des enseignements supérieurs de la Recherche Scientifiques et de l'Innovation,Burkina Faso PhD study Award to Etienne BilgoNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI031478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing bacteria to express and deliver anti-parasite molecules in mosquitoes is among the list of genetic tools to control malaria. The introduction and spread of transgenic bacteria through wild adult mosquitoes is one of the major challenges of this strategy. In prospect of future field experiments, an open field study with blank (without bacteria) attractive sugar bait (ASB) was performed under the assumption that transgenic bacteria would be spread to all sugar fed mosquitoes.

methodsTwo types of ASB stations were developed, one with clay pots (CP) placed at mosquito resting sites and one with window entry traps (WET) placed inside inhabited houses. The ASB consisted in either glucose, honey or fruit cocktail solutions. In addition, mark-release-recapture (MRR) experiment of mosquitoes after feeding them with glucose was also conducted to check the proportion of the mosquito population that can be reached by the two ASB stations as well as its suitability to complement the ASB stations for disseminating bacteria.

resultsOverall, 88% of the mosquitoes were collected in the WET_ASB. The CP_ASB stations were much less attractive with the highest average of 82 ± 11 mosquitoes/day in the CP near the wood piles. The proportions of sugar fed mosquitoes upon ASB were low in both type of ASB stations, ~ 2% and ~ 14% in WET and CP, respectively. Honey solution was the most attractive solution compared to the glucose and the fruit cocktail solutions. The recapture rate in the MRR experiment was low: ~ 4.1% over 7 days.

conclusionThe WET_ASB looks promising to disseminate transgenic bacteria to endophilic West Africa Anopheles mosquito. However, this feeding station may not be fully effective and could be combined with the CP_ASB to also target outdoor resting mosquitoes. Overall, efforts are needed to improve the mosquito-feeding rates upon ASB.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAnimalsAnophelesBurkina FasoCaricaCitrullusCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleFruit and Vegetable JuicesGlucoseHoneyMalariaMaleMosquito ControlSeasonsGlucoseAnophelesAttractive sugar baitMalariaOpen fieldParatransgenesis

Identifiers

PMID30333029
PMCPMC6192189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.