Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30333021›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the hospital survey on patient safety culture in a prehospital environment.

Leif Inge K Sørskår, Eirik B Abrahamsen, Espen Olsen, Stephen J M Sollid, Håkon B Abrahamsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Patient Safety Culture in Latin American Hospitals: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Use of the Hospital Survey of Patient Safety Culture in Norwegian Hospitals: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Measurement and monitoring patient safety in prehospital care: a systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Work Climate Scale in Emergency Services: Abridged Version.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leif Inge K SørskårInstitute for Safety, Economics and Planning, University of Stavanger, Kjølv Egelands hus, Kristine Bonnevies vei 22, 4021, Stavanger, Norway. leif.i.sorskar@uis.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7570-4753
Eirik B AbrahamsenInstitute for Safety, Economics and Planning, University of Stavanger, Kjølv Egelands hus, Kristine Bonnevies vei 22, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.
Espen OlsenCentre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms hus, Kjell Arholms gate 39, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.
Stephen J M SollidFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Norway & Prehospital Clinic, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Håkon B AbrahamsenInstitute for Safety, Economics and Planning, University of Stavanger, Kjølv Egelands hus, Kristine Bonnevies vei 22, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop a culture of patient safety in a regime that strongly focuses on saving patients from emergencies may seem counter-intuitive and challenging. Little research exists on patient safety culture in the context of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), and the use of survey tools represents an appropriate approach to improve patient safety. Research indicates that safety climate studies may predict safety behavior and safety-related outcomes. In this study we apply the Norwegian versions of Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) and assess the psychometric properties when tested on a national sample from the EMS.

methodsThis study adopted a web based survey design. The Norwegian HSOPSC has 13 dimensions, consisting of 46 items, in addition to two single-item outcome variables. SPSS (version 21) was used for descriptive data analysis, estimating internal consistency, and performing exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was applied to test the dimensional structure of the instruments using Amos (version 21).

resultsN = 1387 (27%) EMS employees participated in the survey. Overall, acceptable psychometric properties were observed, i.e. acceptable internal consistencies and construct validity. The patient safety climate dimensions with highest scores (number of positive answers) were "teamwork within units" and "manager expectations & actions promoting patient safety". The dimension "hospital management support for patient safety" had the lowest score.

conclusionsThe results provided a validated instrument, the Prehospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (PreHSOPSC), for measuring patient safety climate in an EMS setting. In addition, the explanatory power was strong for several of the outcome dimensions; i.e., several of the safety climate dimensions have a strong predictive effect on outcome variables related to employees' perceptions on patient safety and safety-related attitude.

Indexed as

Health Care SurveysHospitalsPsychometricsAdultFemaleHospital AdministrationHumansMaleNorwayOrganizational CulturePatient SafetySafety ManagementEmergency medical servicesHSOPSCPatient safety climatePatient safety culturePrehospitalPsychometric properties

Identifiers

PMID30333021
PMCPMC6192077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.