Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30333003›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Decelerated DNA methylation age predicts poor prognosis of breast cancer.

Jun-Ting Ren, Mei-Xia Wang, Yi Su, Lu-Ying Tang, Ze-Fang Ren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Computational Analysis of High-Dimensional DNA Methylation Data for Cancer Prognosis.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Association of Epigenetic Clock with Consensus Molecular Subtypes and Overall Survival of Colorectal Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Jun-Ting RenThe School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, 74 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Mei-Xia WangThe School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, 74 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Yi SuDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Lu-Ying TangThe Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ze-Fang RenThe School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, 74 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China. renzef@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7785-4704
Sun Yat-sen University · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81773515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA methylation (DNAm) age was found to be an indicator for all-cause mortality, cancer incidence, and longevity, but no study has involved in the associations of DNAm age with the prognosis of breast cancer.

methodsWe retrieved information of 1076 breast cancer patients from Genomic Data Commons (GDC) data portal on March 30, 2017, including breast cancer DNAm profiling, demographic features, clinicopathological parameters, recurrence, and all-cause fatality. Horvath's method was applied to calculate the DNAm age. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to test the associations between DNAm age of the cancerous tissues and the prognosis (recurrence of breast cancer and all-cause fatality) with or without adjusting for chronological age and clinicopathological parameters.

resultsThe DNAm age was markedly decelerated in the patients who were premenopausal, ER or PR negative, HER2-enriched or basal-like than their counterparts. In the first five-year follow-up dataset for survival, every ten-year increase in DNAm age was associated with a 15% decrease in fatality; subjects with DNAm age in the second (HR: 0.52; 95%CI: 0.29-0.92), the third (HR: 0.49; 95%CI: 0.27-0.87) and the fourth quartile (HR: 0.38; 95%CI: 0.20-0.72) had significant longer survival time than those in the first quartile. In the first five-year follow-up dataset for recurrence, every ten-year increase in DNAm age was associated with a 14% decrease of the recurrence; in the categorical analysis, a clear dose-response was shown (P for trend =0.02) and the fourth quartile was associated with a longer recurrence free survival (HR: 0.32; 95%CI: 0.14-0.74). In the full follow-up dataset, similar results were obtained.

conclusionsDNAm age of breast cancer tissue, which associated with menopausal status and pathological features, was a strong independent predictor of the prognosis. It was suggested that the prognosis of breast cancer was related to intrinsic biological changes and specific molecular targets for treatment of breast cancer may be implicit.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualDNA MethylationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerDNA methylation agePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID30333003
PMCPMC6191915
OpenAlexW2897814271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.