Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30332782›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Recent Progress on Microelectrodes in Neural Interfaces.

Geon Hwee Kim, Kanghyun Kim, Eunji Lee, Taechang An, WooSeok Choi, Geunbae Lim, Jung Hwal Shin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Noise Power Minimization in CMOS Brain-Chip Interfaces.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Interface Design for Stretchable Electronic Devices.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Geon Hwee KimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea. q16164545@postech.ac.kr.
Kanghyun KimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea. qwnerkang@postech.ac.kr.
Eunji LeeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea. eunji4993@postech.ac.kr.
Taechang AnDepartment of Mechanical Design Engineering, Andong National University, Kyungbuk 760-749, Korea. tcmerias@anu.ac.kr.
WooSeok ChoiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju 380-702, Korea. w.choi@ut.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-4394-1751
Geunbae LimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea. limmems@postech.ac.kr.
Jung Hwal ShinSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Kyungnam University, Changwon 51767, Korea. junghwal@kyungnam.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2016R1C1B1015521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain‒machine interface (BMI) is a promising technology that looks set to contribute to the development of artificial limbs and new input devices by integrating various recent technological advances, including neural electrodes, wireless communication, signal analysis, and robot control. Neural electrodes are a key technological component of BMI, as they can record the rapid and numerous signals emitted by neurons. To receive stable, consistent, and accurate signals, electrodes are designed in accordance with various templates using diverse materials. With the development of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology, electrodes have become more integrated, and their performance has gradually evolved through surface modification and advances in biotechnology. In this paper, we review the development of the extracellular/intracellular type of in vitro microelectrode array (MEA) to investigate neural interface technology and the penetrating/surface (non-penetrating) type of in vivo electrodes. We briefly examine the history and study the recently developed shapes and various uses of the electrode. Also, electrode materials and surface modification techniques are reviewed to measure high-quality neural signals that can be used in BMI.

Indexed as

brain‒machine interface (BMI)chronically implanted neural electrodeselectroencephalogram (EEG) electrodemicroelectrode array (MEA)neural electrodesurface modification

Identifiers

PMID30332782
PMCPMC6213370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.