Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30332540›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2018

Small-scale egg production centres increase children's egg consumption in rural Zambia.

Sarah E Dumas, Dale Lewis, Alexander J Travis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03926689 (Evaluating the Impact of Sending SMS Messages to Increase Egg Consumption Among Children One 1-2 Years of Age, a Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial in Kanchanpur, Nepal), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03926689 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Impact of Sending SMS Messages to Increase Egg Consumption Among Children One 1-2 Years of Age, a Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial in Kanchanpur, Nepal

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelen Keller InternationalRan2019 to 2021Enrolled3,301ConditionsDietary HabitsArmsSMS messages, Standard SII SBCC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah E DumasMaster of Public Health Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0974-6437
Dale LewisCommunity Markets for Conservation, Lusaka, Zambia.
Alexander J TravisMaster of Public Health Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5010-7568

Funding

Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000457 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$46.0M
Graduate Training Program in Comparative MedicineT32OD011000 · OD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Amanda Marjorie DE MESTRE · 2012 to 2026
$5.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000457NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NIH HHS T32 OD011000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal source foods can efficiently enhance dietary quality, but they remain inaccessible and unaffordable for many women and young children in remote, low-income communities. We piloted an intervention in which 20 groups established egg production centres (EPCs) in their rural Zambian communities to increase the availability of eggs in the local food system. In a repeated cross-sectional design over 1 year (midline [4 months after the start of egg production] and endline [11 months]), we evaluated programme impact on household egg acquisition within those communities and on egg consumption and height-for-age z score (HAZ) among young children (6-36 months) using multilevel linear, logistic, and truncated negative binomial regression techniques. At midline, households in project areas were significantly more likely to consume eggs than those in control areas (OR 2.08, 95% CI [1.56, 2.78]), particularly those located within 250 m of the EPC. Similarly, children living in project communities were significantly more likely to consume eggs at midline than those in control areas (OR 5.53, 95% CI [2.90, 10.58]). Although increased over baseline, egg acquisition and consumption decreased by endline because of depressed egg production over time. There was no impact on children's HAZ, likely because of the short follow-up time and relatively modest "dose" of egg consumption. Although productivity can be improved, the EPC programme offers a novel approach to improving access to eggs in rural communities, and optimization of the production practices and marketing is needed to ensure that egg consumption translates to improved dietary quality, growth, and health.

Indexed as

DietEggsSocial WelfareAgricultureAnimalsChickensChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, HealthyFemaleHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaleRural Populationanimal source foodschild nutritioneggsfood systemsnutrition-sensitive agriculturestunting

Identifiers

PMID30332540
PMCPMC6865982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.