Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30332475›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Nanotracing and cavity-ring down spectroscopy: A new ultrasensitive approach in large molecule drug disposition studies.

Nicole A Kratochwil, Stephen R Dueker, Dieter Muri, Claudia Senn, HyeJin Yoon, Byung-Yong Yu, Gwan-Ho Lee, Feng Dong, Michael B Otteneder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. OpticalAnalytical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  3. Mid-infrared trace detection with parts-per-quadrillion quantitation accuracy: Expanding frontiers of radiocarbon sensing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nutrients · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicole A KratochwilPharmaceutical Sciences and Therapeutic Modalities, Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2149-4375
Stephen R DuekerBioCore Ltd, Seoul, South Korea.
Dieter MuriPharmaceutical Sciences and Therapeutic Modalities, Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Claudia SennPharmaceutical Sciences and Therapeutic Modalities, Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
HyeJin YoonBioCore Ltd, Seoul, South Korea.
Byung-Yong YuKorea Institute of Science &Technology, Seoul, South Korea.
Gwan-Ho LeeKorea Institute of Science &Technology, Seoul, South Korea.
Feng DongPicarro, Inc., Santa Clara, California, United States of America.
Michael B OttenederPharmaceutical Sciences and Therapeutic Modalities, Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHKorea Institute of Science and Technology · KRPicarro (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New therapeutic biological entities such as bispecific antibodies targeting tissue or specific cell populations form an increasingly important part of the drug development portfolio. However, these biopharmaceutical agents bear the risk of extensive target-mediated drug disposition or atypical pharmacokinetic properties as compared to canonical antibodies. Pharmacokinetics and bio-distribution studies become therefore more and more important during lead optimization. Biologics present, however, greater analytical challenges than small molecule drugs due to the mass and selectivity limitation of mass spectrometry and ligand-binding assay, respectively. Radiocarbon (14C) and its detection methods, such as the emerging 14C cavity ring down spectroscopy (CRDS), thus can play an important role in the large molecule quantitation where a 14C-tag is covalently bound through a stable linker. CRDS has the advantage of a simplified sample preparation and introduction system as compared to accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) and can be accommodated within an ordinary research laboratory. In this study, we report on the labeling of an anti-IL17 IgG1 model antibody with 14C propionate tag and its detection by CRDS using it as nanotracer (2.1 nCi or 77.7 Bq blended with the therapeutic dose) in a pharmacokinetics study in a preclinical species. We compare these data to data generated by AMS in parallel processed samples. The derived concentration time profiles for anti-IL17 by CRDS were in concordance with the ones derived by AMS and γ-counting of an 125I-labeled anti-IL17 radiotracer and were well described by a 2-compartment population pharmacokinetic model. In addition, antibody tissue distribution coefficients for anti-IL17 were determined by CRDS, which proved to be a direct and sensitive measurement of the extravascular tissue concentration of the antibody when tissue perfusion was applied. Thus, this proof-of-concept study demonstrates that trace 14C-radiolabels and CRDS are an ultrasensitive approach in (pre)clinical pharmacokinetics and bio-distribution studies of new therapeutic entities.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalCarbon RadioisotopesHumansInterleukin-17Iodine RadioisotopesMass SpectrometrySpectrum AnalysisTissue DistributionAntibodies, MonoclonalCarbon RadioisotopesInterleukin-17Iodine-125Iodine Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID30332475
PMCPMC6192596
OpenAlexW2896431229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.