ArticlePloS one2018
Suppression of 18F-FDG signal in the bladder on small animal PET-CT.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced quantification pipeline reveals new spatial and temporal tumor characteristics in preclinical multiple myeloma.EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Different hydration protocols for the quantification of healthy tissue uptake of half-doseQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Clostridium difficile Infection with PET/CT Imaging in a Mouse Model.Molecular imaging and biology · 2020Article
- The Relationship of Metabolic Activity and αvβ3 Receptor Expression in Aggressive Breast Cancer Subtypes Tumors: A Preliminary Report.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRetention of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose 18F-FDG in the bladder causes more problems in small animal research than in human research owing to the smaller size of the subject. Catheterization has been proposed to reduce bladder spillover both in human studies and in small animal research. Noninvasive alternatives such as hydration plus furosemide also seem to be a promising pre-imaging strategy for decreasing bladder spillover. Our main goal was to measure the effects of the combination of furosemide and hydration for reducing bladder signal directly on mouse bowel 18F-FDG-PET images.
methodsNine mice were divided into two groups: the control group (C, n = 4) and the treatment group (n = 5). The clearance protocol combines hyperhydration and a single furosemide dose during the 18F-FDG uptake period. Two images were acquired on different days in treated mice to evaluate two different furosemide doses (low dose, LD, 3.5 mg/kg; and high dose, HD, 7 mg/kg). A region of interest was drawn on each computed tomography image (bladder, kidneys, liver, muscle, and bone marrow). To quantify bladder spillover, two different areas of the colon were selected.
resultsA remarkable reduction in bladder spillover was achieved on 18F-FDG -PET in both groups. Our imaging findings were quantified, and both furosemide doses induced a decrease in mean standard uptake values (SUVmean) compared with the controls (LD 1.46 ± 0.54 and HD 1.05 ± 0.29; controls: 8.90 ± 3.4 [p-value < 0.05]).
conclusionWe validated a non-invasive, easy, and harmless pre-imaging alternative for decreasing 18F-FDG bladder spillover. Our study shows the effect of furosemide on bladder spillover directly on 18F-FDG-PET images by measuring SUVmean in the bladder, colon, liver, muscle, and bone marrow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.