Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30332400›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Predicting B cell receptor substitution profiles using public repertoire data.

Amrit Dhar, Kristian Davidsen, Frederick A Matsen, Vladimir N Minin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amrit DharDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Kristian DavidsenComputational Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Frederick A MatsenComputational Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0607-6025
Vladimir N MininDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1917-9288

Funding

Modeling the dynamics and evolution of immune responses to influenza virusesU19AI117891 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI AHMED, RAFI, ANTIA, RUSTOM NOSHIR · 2015 to 2019
$8.4M
DEFINING THE INFANT IMMUNE RESPONSE TO HIVR01AI120961 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI OVERBAUGH, JULIE M. · 2016 to 2020
$4.1M
Leveraing deep sequencing data to understand antibody maturationR01GM113246 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MATSEN, FREDERICK ALBERT · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
FHCRC High-Performance Computing ClusterS10OD020069 · OD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI KOOPERBERG, CHARLES L · 2015 to 2015
$600k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI120961NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI117891NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113246NIH HHS S10 OD020069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B cells develop high affinity receptors during the course of affinity maturation, a cyclic process of mutation and selection. At the end of affinity maturation, a number of cells sharing the same ancestor (i.e. in the same "clonal family") are released from the germinal center; their amino acid frequency profile reflects the allowed and disallowed substitutions at each position. These clonal-family-specific frequency profiles, called "substitution profiles", are useful for studying the course of affinity maturation as well as for antibody engineering purposes. However, most often only a single sequence is recovered from each clonal family in a sequencing experiment, making it impossible to construct a clonal-family-specific substitution profile. Given the public release of many high-quality large B cell receptor datasets, one may ask whether it is possible to use such data in a prediction model for clonal-family-specific substitution profiles. In this paper, we present the method "Substitution Profiles Using Related Families" (SPURF), a penalized tensor regression framework that integrates information from a rich assemblage of datasets to predict the clonal-family-specific substitution profile for any single input sequence. Using this framework, we show that substitution profiles from similar clonal families can be leveraged together with simulated substitution profiles and germline gene sequence information to improve prediction. We fit this model on a large public dataset and validate the robustness of our approach on two external datasets. Furthermore, we provide a command-line tool in an open-source software package (https://github.com/krdav/SPURF) implementing these ideas and providing easy prediction using our pre-fit models.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsB-LymphocytesClone CellsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinHumansModels, ImmunologicalReceptors, Antigen, B-CellRecombinant ProteinsAmino AcidsReceptors, Antigen, B-CellRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30332400
PMCPMC6205660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.