Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30332309›Full record

ArticleAIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education2018

PrEP Continuation, HIV and STI Testing Rates, and Delivery of Preventive Care in a Clinic-Based Cohort.

Matthew A Hevey, Jennifer L Walsh, Andrew E Petroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Testing paradox may explain increased observed prevalence of bacterial STIs among MSM on HIV PrEP: A modeling study.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Gaps in Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening Among Men who Have Sex with Men in Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Care in the United States.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew A HeveyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Jennifer L WalshCenter for AIDS Intervention Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Andrew E PetrollCenter for AIDS Intervention Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Funding

QUANTITATIVE COREP30MH052776 · NIMH · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI KELLY, JEFFREY A · 1994 to 2018
$33.2M
Integrative Data Analysis of HIV Prevention TrialsK01MH099956 · NIMH · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI WALSH, JENNIFER LYNN · 2013 to 2017
$793k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH099956NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH052776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective method of reducing HIV incidence. Questions remain regarding PrEP's efficacy and outcomes in real-world clinical settings. We conducted a retrospective review to assess PrEP outcomes in an academic clinic setting and focused on retention in care, reasons for discontinuation, and receipt of appropriate preventive care (immunizations, HIV testing, and STI testing). One hundred thirty-four patients were seen between 2010 and 2016 over 309 visits. One hundred sixteen patients (87%) started daily PrEP and of those, 88 (76%) attended at least one 6-month follow-up visit. Over 60% of PrEP patients completed all recommended STI screening after starting PrEP. Only 40% of patients had all appropriate immunizations at baseline; 78% had all appropriate immunizations at study completion. This study demonstrated high rates of both retention and of attaining recommended preventive care in a clinical setting outside of the rigors of clinical trials.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePatient ComplianceAdolescentAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAnti-HIV AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPre-Exposure ProphylaxisPrimary PreventionRetrospective StudiesAnti-HIV AgentsHIVpre-exposure prophylaxispreventionpreventive carereal-world clinic setting

Identifiers

PMID30332309
PMCPMC6535209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.