Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30328990›Full record

SynthesisRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva

Effectiveness of rapid response teams in reducing intrahospital cardiac arrests and deaths: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hermano Alexandre Lima Rocha, Antônia Célia de Castro Alcântara, Sabrina Gabriele Maia Oliveira Rocha, Cristiana Maria Toscano

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dedicated rapid response team implementation associated with reductions in hospital mortality and hospital expenses: a retrospective cohort analysis.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hermano Alexandre Lima RochaCentro Universitário Unichristus - Fortaleza (CE), Brasil.
Antônia Célia de Castro AlcântaraHospital Regional da Unimed Fortaleza - Fortaleza (CE), Brasil.
Sabrina Gabriele Maia Oliveira RochaUniversidade Federal do Ceará - Fortaleza (CE), Brasil.
Cristiana Maria ToscanoUniversidade Federal de Goiás - Goiânia (GO), Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BRUniversidade de Fortaleza · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of rapid response teams using early identification of clinical deterioration in reducing the occurrence of in-hospital mortality and cardiorespiratory arrest. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane Library, Center for Reviews and Dissemination databases were searched. STUDY SELECTION: We included studies that evaluated the effectiveness of rapid response teams in adult hospital units, published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish, from 2000 to 2016; systematic reviews, clinical trials, cohort studies, and prepost ecological studies were eligible for inclusion. The quality of studies was independently assessed by two researchers using the Newcastle-Ottawa, modified Jadad, and Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews scales. DATA EXTRACTIONS: The results were synthesized and tabulated. When risk measures were reported by the authors of the included studies, we estimated effectiveness as 1-RR or 1-OR. In pre-post studies, we estimated effectiveness as the percent decrease in rates following the intervention.

resultsOverall, 278 studies were identified, 256 of which were excluded after abstract evaluation, and two of which were excluded after full text evaluation. In the meta-analysis of the studies reporting mortality data, we calculated a risk ratio of 0.85 (95%CI 0.76 - 0.94); and for studies reporting cardiac arrest data the estimated risk ratio was 0.65 (95%CI 0.49 - 0.87). Evidence was assessed as low quality due to the high heterogeneity and risk of bias in primary studies.

conclusionWe conclude that rapid response teams may reduce in-hospital mortality and cardiac arrests, although the quality of evidence for both outcomes is low.

Indexed as

AdultDeath, Sudden, CardiacHeart ArrestHospital MortalityHospital Rapid Response TeamHumans

Identifiers

PMID30328990
PMCPMC6180469
OpenAlexW2893768145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.