Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30328577›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2020

Spanish Cultural Validation of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised.

María Magán-Maganto, Ricardo Canal-Bedia, Aránzazu Hernández-Fabián, Álvaro Bejarano-Martín, Clara J Fernández-Álvarez, María Martínez-Velarte, Maria V Martín-Cilleros, Noelia Flores-Robaina, Herbert Roeyers, Manuel Posada de la Paz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Is traditional back translation enough? Comparison of translation methodology for an ASD screening tool.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

María Magán-MagantoCentro de Atención Integral al Autismo (INFOAUTISMO), Faculty of Education, University Institute of Community Integration (INICO), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9279-9256
Ricardo Canal-BediaCentro de Atención Integral al Autismo (INFOAUTISMO), Faculty of Education, University Institute of Community Integration (INICO), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain. rcanal@usal.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0247-0295
Aránzazu Hernández-FabiánHospital Universitario de Salamanca, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Álvaro Bejarano-MartínCentro de Atención Integral al Autismo (INFOAUTISMO), Faculty of Education, University Institute of Community Integration (INICO), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Clara J Fernández-ÁlvarezCentro de Atención Integral al Autismo (INFOAUTISMO), Faculty of Education, University Institute of Community Integration (INICO), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
María Martínez-VelarteServicio de Psiquiatría del Complejo Asistencial de Zamora, Zamora, Spain.
Maria V Martín-CillerosCentro de Atención Integral al Autismo (INFOAUTISMO), Faculty of Education, University Institute of Community Integration (INICO), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Noelia Flores-RobainaFaculty of Psychology, University Institute of Community Integration (INICO), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Herbert RoeyersDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Manuel Posada de la PazInstitute of Rare Diseases Research & CIBERER, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Directorate-General for Health and Consumers SANCO/2014/C2/035Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación PSI2013-47840-RSecretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación PSI2016-80575-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers-revised/follow-up (M-CHAT-R/F) was developed to reduce the number of cases requiring telephone verification. The aim of this study was to validate a Spanish version of the M-CHAT-R/F in the Spanish public health system. The M-CHAT-R/F was translated, culturally adapted, and then administered to 6625 children. Of the 39 positive screening cases, 15 children were diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and 24 with non-ASD disorders or delays. The sensitivity was 0.79 and specificity of 0.99. Positive and negative predictive values were 0.39 and 0.99, respectively. These results are similar to the English equivalent, though observed prevalence was lower. This study supports Spanish National Health System policy makers to consider a universal ASD screening program.

Indexed as

Cultural CharacteristicsTranslatingAutistic DisorderChecklistChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMass ScreeningReproducibility of ResultsSpainAutismCross-cultural validationEarly detectionM-CHAT-R/FScreening tools

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.