Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30328479›Full record

ArticleHerz2018

[MINOCA-myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries].

C Hamm, C W Hamm

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Herz, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C HammCampus Kerckhoff, Universität Gießen, Bad Nauheim, Deutschland.
C W HammCampus Kerckhoff, Universität Gießen, Bad Nauheim, Deutschland. Christian.Hamm@innere.med.uni-giessen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years it has been observed with increasing interest that there is a group of patients with electrocardiographic and laboratory features of myocardial infarction (MI) but no obstructive coronary artery disease (<50% diameter stenosis). For this entity the term myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) has been coined. The prevalence of MINOCA is estimated to be 6-9% among patients diagnosed with MI and it is more common in women than men as well as in patients presenting with NSTEMI than in those presenting with STEMI. The MINOCA is a working diagnosis that requires a further diagnostic work-up by invasive techniques, such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) or non-invasive imaging with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). When it is ascertained that obstructive coronary artery disease has not been inadvertently overlooked, other coronary disorders, such as plaque rupture or erosion, thrombosis, dissection, spasms or microvascular dysfunction should be evaluated. Furthermore, myocarditis or tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy should be excluded by CMRI as non-coronary causes. The further treatment and prognosis of patients with MINOCA depend on the underlying cause and the final diagnosis.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial InfarctionTakotsubo CardiomyopathyCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleCardiac magnetic resonance imagingCoronary spasmIntravascular ultrasoundOptical coherence tomographyPlaque rupture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.