Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30328316›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2018

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening among Women in Korea, 2005-2015.

Eunji Choi, Yoon Young Lee, Mina Suh, Eun Young Lee, Tran Thi Xuan Mai, Moran Ki, Jin Kyoung Oh, Hyunsoon Cho, Boyoung Park, Jae Kwan Jun and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eunji ChoiGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Yoon Young LeeNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Mina SuhNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Eun Young LeeGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Tran Thi Xuan MaiGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Moran KiGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Jin Kyoung OhGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Hyunsoon ChoGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Boyoung ParkGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Jae Kwan JunNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Yeol KimNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Kui Son ChoiGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. kschoi@ncc.re.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5336-3874

Funding

International Cooperation & Education Program #NCCRI·NCCI 52210-52211National Cancer Center #1610401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConsistent evidence indicates that cervical and breast cancer screening rates are low among socioeconomically deprived women. This study aimed to assess trends in cervical and breast cancer screening rates and to analyze socioeconomic inequalities among Korean women from 2005 to 2015. MATERIALS AND

methodsData from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, an annual nationwide cross-sectional survey, were utilized. A total of 19910 women were finally included for analysis. Inequalities in education and household income status were estimated by slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII), along with calculation of annual percent changes (APCs), to show trends in cancer screening rates.

resultsCervical and breast cancer screening rates increased from 54.8% in 2005 to 65.6% in 2015 and from 37.6% in 2005 to 61.2% in 2015, respectively. APCs in breast cancer screening rates were significant among women with higher levels of household income and education status. Inequalities by household income in cervical cancer screening uptake were observed with a pooled SII estimate of 10.6% (95% CI: 8.1 to 13.2) and RII of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3 to 1.6). Income inequalities in breast cancer screening were shown to gradually increase over time with a pooled SII of 5.9% (95% CI: 2.9 to 9.0) and RII of 1.2 (95% CI: 0.9 to 1.3). Educational inequalities appeared to diminish over the study period for both cervical and breast cancer screening.

conclusionOur study identified significant inequalities among socioeconomically deprived women in cervical and breast cancer screening in Korea. Especially, income-related inequalities were greater than education-related inequalities, and these were constant from 2005 to 2015 for both cervical and breast cancer screening.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesSocial ClassAdultBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRegistriesRepublic of KoreaSocioeconomic FactorsUterine Cervical Neoplasmsbreast neoplasmsearly detection of cancerhealthcare disparitiessocioeconomic factorsUterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30328316
PMCPMC6192888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.