ArticleStatistics in medicine2019
Population-calibrated multiple imputation for a binary/categorical covariate in categorical regression models.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mind the Gaps: Literature Survey Reveals Shortcomings in Handling Missing Data in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), a UK Primary Care Health Records Database.Clinical epidemiology · 2025Article
- Missing data and missed infections: investigating racial and ethnic disparities in SARS-CoV-2 testing and infection rates in Holyoke, Massachusetts.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Moving Beyond Medical Statistics: A Systematic Review on Missing Data Handling in Electronic Health Records.Health data science · 2024Review
- HIV suppression was maintained during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malawi: a program-level cohort study.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- Influence of circulatory shock at hospital admission on outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Combining Longitudinal Data From Different Cohorts to Examine the Life-Course Trajectory.American journal of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Invited Commentary: Treatment Drop-in-Making the Case for Causal Prediction.American journal of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Standard multiple imputation of survey data didn't perform better than simple substitution in enhancing an administrative dataset: the example of self-rated health in England.Emerging themes in epidemiology · 2021Article
- Prescribing sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes in primary care: influence of renal function and heart failure diagnosis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2021Observational
- Article
- The use of electronic healthcare records for colorectal cancer screening referral decisions and risk prediction model development.BMC gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods.Statistics in medicine · 2019Article
- Population-calibrated multiple imputation for a binary/categorical covariate in categorical regression models.Statistics in medicine · 2019Article
- Ethnic Differences in the Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Diagnoses in the UK: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Health Improvement Network Primary Care Database.Clinical epidemiology · 2019Article
- Health indicator recording in UK primary care electronic health records: key implications for handling missing data.Clinical epidemiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple imputation (MI) has become popular for analyses with missing data in medical research. The standard implementation of MI is based on the assumption of data being missing at random (MAR). However, for missing data generated by missing not at random mechanisms, MI performed assuming MAR might not be satisfactory. For an incomplete variable in a given data set, its corresponding population marginal distribution might also be available in an external data source. We show how this information can be readily utilised in the imputation model to calibrate inference to the population by incorporating an appropriately calculated offset termed the "calibrated-δ adjustment." We describe the derivation of this offset from the population distribution of the incomplete variable and show how, in applications, it can be used to closely (and often exactly) match the post-imputation distribution to the population level. Through analytic and simulation studies, we show that our proposed calibrated-δ adjustment MI method can give the same inference as standard MI when data are MAR, and can produce more accurate inference under two general missing not at random missingness mechanisms. The method is used to impute missing ethnicity data in a type 2 diabetes prevalence case study using UK primary care electronic health records, where it results in scientifically relevant changes in inference for non-White ethnic groups compared with standard MI. Calibrated-δ adjustment MI represents a pragmatic approach for utilising available population-level information in a sensitivity analysis to explore potential departures from the MAR assumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.