Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30328092›Full record

ReviewJournal of nephrology2019

Kidney transplantation in patients with previous renal cancer: a critical appraisal of current evidence and guidelines.

Giovanni M Frascà, Fabiana Brigante, Alessandro Volpe, Laura Cosmai, Maurizio Gallieni, Camillo Porta

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni M FrascàNephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0159-7657
Fabiana BriganteNephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
Alessandro VolpeUrology Department, University of Novara, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy.
Laura CosmaiNephrology and Dialysis Unit, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio GallieniNephrology and Dialysis Unit, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Camillo PortaMedical Oncology, I.R.C.C.S. San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Maggiore · ITOspedale San Carlo · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the increasing occurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the general population and the high prevalence of chronic kidney disease among cancer patients, many people with a previous RCC may eventually require renal replacement therapy including kidney transplantation. They should accordingly be evaluated to assess their life expectancy and the risk that the chronic immunosuppressive therapy needed after grafting might impair their long-term outcome. Current guidelines on listing patients for renal transplantation suggest that no delay is required for subjects with small or incidentally discovered RCC, while the recommendations for patients who have been treated for a symptomatic RCC or for those with large or invasive tumours are conflicting. The controversial results reported by even recent studies focusing on the cancer risk in kidney graft recipients with a prior history of malignancy do not help to clarify the doubts arising in everyday clinical practice. Several tools, including integrated scoring systems, are currently available to assess the prognosis of patients with a previous RCC and, although they have not been validated in subjects receiving long-term immunosuppressive drugs, they can be used to identify patients suitable to be listed for grafting. Among these, the Leibovich score is currently the most widely used as it has proved simple and reliable enough and helps categorize renal transplant candidates. According to this system, subjects with a score from 0 to 2 are at low risk and may be listed without delay, while those with a score of 6 or higher should be excluded from grafting. In addition, other factors have an established positive prognostic value, including chromophobe or clear cell papillary tumour, or G1 grade cancer; on the contrary, medullary or Bellini's duct carcinoma or those with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation at histological examination should be excluded. All other patients would be better submitted to careful individual evaluation by an Oncologist before being listed for renal transplantation, pending studies specifically focusing on cancer risk evaluation in people already treated for malignancy receiving long-term immunosuppressive therapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellEvidence-Based MedicineGraft SurvivalHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney NeoplasmsKidney TransplantationPractice Guidelines as TopicPrevalenceRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeImmunosuppressive AgentsCancer riskKidney transplantationOnconephrologyRenal cancer

Identifiers

PMID30328092
OpenAlexW2897947802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.