Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30327923›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2019

Quantitative analysis of individual cell-free DNA concentration before and after penetrating trauma.

Katrin Brodbeck, Stefanie Kern, Sylvia Schick, Arnd Steinbrück, Michael Schwerer, Birgit Bayer, Katja Anslinger, Steffen Peldschus

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katrin BrodbeckInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Nußbaumstr 26, 80336, Munich, Germany. katrin.brodbeck@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8161-376X
Stefanie KernInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Nußbaumstr 26, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Sylvia SchickInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Nußbaumstr 26, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Arnd SteinbrückDept. of Orthopaedics, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Michael SchwererInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Nußbaumstr 26, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Birgit BayerInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Nußbaumstr 26, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Katja AnslingerInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Nußbaumstr 26, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Steffen PeldschusInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Nußbaumstr 26, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCell-free DNA (cfDNA) elevations were remarked in the blood of trauma patients. Published increases refer to comparative values of a healthy control group, ignoring thereby inter- and intra-individual differences under normal conditions. The aim of this study was to quantify cfDNA in patients in the time course of a planned orthopedic surgery, which constitutes the advantage of obtaining individual pre- and post-trauma values for each patient. By this approach, a basis should be established for the potential future application of cfDNA as biomarker for the detection of mild injuries related to volunteer experiments in forensic biomechanics.

methodsPlasma samples of ten patients obtaining knee or hip arthroplasty were analyzed quantitatively for cfDNA by real-time qPCR the day prior operation (Prior), immediately afterwards (Day0), and the day after the surgery (Day1).

resultsPrior values exhibited a broad range, indicating pronounced inter-individual differences in the basic level of cfDNA. After surgery, levels were significantly elevated on both days (Wilcoxon test p = 0.002). In nine patients, highest values were measured on Day0, whereby a fold change of 19 was remarked once. After Day0, values decreased, though they did not reach Prior values until Day1 in nine patients.

conclusionEndoprosthesis surgery represents a well-defined trauma scenario for the measurement of individual cfDNA elevations. The analysis of pre- to post-trauma alterations lay the groundwork for the application of cfDNA as biomarker for the detection of minor injuries in the field of forensic biomechanics.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCell-Free Nucleic AcidsFemaleHumansMalePostoperative PeriodPreoperative PeriodReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkersCell-Free Nucleic AcidsArthroplastyCell-free DNAForensic biomechanicsIndividual valuesInjuryTrauma

Identifiers

PMID30327923
OpenAlexW2896289845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.