Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30327898›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2018

Multicolour imaging with spectral photon-counting CT: a phantom study.

Salim Si-Mohamed, Daniel Bar-Ness, Monica Sigovan, Valérie Tatard-Leitman, David P Cormode, Pratap C Naha, Philippe Coulon, Lucie Rascle, Ewald Roessl, Michal Rokni and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. K-Edge imaging using a clinical dual-source photon-counting CT system.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multifunctional Poly(Acrylic Acid)-Coated EuBiGdInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Salim Si-MohamedUniversity Claude Bernard Lyon1, CREATIS, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1206, INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France. salimaymeric@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0314-4010
Daniel Bar-NessUniversity Claude Bernard Lyon1, CREATIS, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1206, INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France.
Monica SigovanUniversity Claude Bernard Lyon1, CREATIS, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1206, INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France.
Valérie Tatard-LeitmanUniversity Claude Bernard Lyon1, CREATIS, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1206, INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France.
David P CormodeDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pratap C NahaDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Philippe CoulonCT Clinical Science, Philips, Suresnes, France.
Lucie RascleUniversity Claude Bernard Lyon1, CREATIS, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1206, INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France.
Ewald RoesslPhilips GmbH Innovative Technologies, Research Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany.
Michal RokniGlobal Advanced Technologies, CT, Philips, Haifa, Israel.
Ami AltmanGlobal Advanced Technologies, CT, Philips, Haifa, Israel.
Yoad YagilGlobal Advanced Technologies, CT, Philips, Haifa, Israel.
Loic BousselUniversity Claude Bernard Lyon1, CREATIS, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1206, INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France.
Philippe DouekUniversity Claude Bernard Lyon1, CREATIS, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1206, INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRPhilips (Israel) · ILUniversity of Pennsylvania · USPhilips (France) · FRPhilips (Germany) · DE

Funding

Biodegradable polymetal nanoparticle CT contrast agents for vascular imagingR01HL131557 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CORMODE, DAVID PETER · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Horizon 2020 () 643694National Institute of General Medical Sciences HL131557NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the feasibility of multicolour quantitative imaging with spectral photon-counting computed tomography (SPCCT) of different mixed contrast agents.

methodsPhantoms containing eleven tubes with mixtures of varying proportions of two contrast agents (i.e. two selected from gadolinium, iodine or gold nanoparticles) were prepared so that the attenuation of each tube was about 280 HU. Scans were acquired at 120 kVp and 100 mAs using a five-bin preclinical SPCCT prototype, generating conventional, water, iodine, gadolinium and gold images. The correlation between prepared and measured concentrations was assessed using linear regression. The cross-contamination was measured for each material as the root mean square error (RMSE) of its concentration in the other material images, where no signal was expected. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) relative to a phosphate buffered saline tube was calculated for each contrast agent.

resultsThe solutions had similar attenuations (279 ± 10 HU, mean ± standard deviation) and could not be differentiated on conventional images. However, a distinction was observed in the material images within the same samples, and the measured and prepared concentrations were strongly correlated (R

conclusionsSPCCT enables multicolour quantitative imaging. As a result, it should be possible to perform imaging of multiple uptake phases of a given tissue/organ within a single scan by injecting different contrast agents sequentially.

Indexed as

GadoliniumGoldIodinePhantoms (imaging)Tomography (x-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID30327898
PMCPMC6191405
OpenAlexW2894353155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.