Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30327571›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Feature selectivity is stable in primary visual cortex across a range of spatial frequencies.

Brian B Jeon, Alex D Swain, Jeffrey T Good, Steven M Chase, Sandra J Kuhlman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dynamic Distortion of Orientation Representation after Learning in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brian B JeonCenter for Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.
Alex D SwainUniversity of Pittsburgh Integrative Systems Biology Program, Pittsburgh, USA.
Jeffrey T GoodDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.
Steven M ChaseCenter for Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4450-6313
Sandra J KuhlmanCenter for Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA. skuhlman@cmu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0450-7282
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USCarnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

Inhibitory regulation of visual processing and plasticity in visual cortexR01EY024678 · NEI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KUHLMAN, SANDRA J · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI) R01EY024678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable perception of environmental signals is a critical first step to generating appropriate responses and actions in awake behaving animals. The extent to which stimulus features are stably represented at the level of individual neurons is not well understood. To address this issue, we investigated the persistence of stimulus response tuning over the course of 1-2 weeks in the primary visual cortex of awake, adult mice. Using 2-photon calcium imaging, we directly compared tuning stability to two stimulus features (orientation and spatial frequency) within the same neurons, specifically in layer 2/3 excitatory neurons. The majority of neurons that were tracked and tuned on consecutive imaging sessions maintained stable orientation and spatial frequency preferences (83% and 76% of the population, respectively) over a 2-week period. Selectivity, measured as orientation and spatial frequency bandwidth, was also stable. Taking into account all 4 parameters, we found that the proportion of stable neurons was less than two thirds (57%). Thus, a substantial fraction of neurons (43%) were unstable in at least one parameter. Furthermore, we found that instability of orientation preference was not predictive of instability of spatial frequency preference within the same neurons. Population analysis revealed that noise correlation values were stable well beyond the estimated decline in monosynaptic connectivity (~250-300 microns). Our results demonstrate that orientation preference is stable across a range of spatial frequencies and that the tuning of distinct stimulus features can be independently maintained within a single neuron.

Indexed as

Orientation, SpatialAlgorithmsAnimalsMiceModels, TheoreticalNeuronsPhotic StimulationSpace PerceptionVisual CortexVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID30327571
PMCPMC6191427
OpenAlexW2896336675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.