Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30327507›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Quantitative vessel tortuosity: A potential CT imaging biomarker for distinguishing lung granulomas from adenocarcinomas.

Mehdi Alilou, Mahdi Orooji, Niha Beig, Prateek Prasanna, Prabhakar Rajiah, Christopher Donatelli, Vamsidhar Velcheti, Sagar Rakshit, Michael Yang, Frank Jacono and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Towards equitable AI in oncology.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Novel Radiomic Measurements of Tumor-Associated Vasculature Morphology on Clinical Imaging as a Biomarker of Treatment Response in Multiple Cancers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Applications of artificial intelligence in oncologicAnnals of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mehdi AlilouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. mehdi.alilou@case.edu.
Mahdi OroojiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Niha BeigDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1150-5886
Prateek PrasannaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Prabhakar RajiahUniversity Hospital Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Christopher DonatelliUniversity Hospital Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Vamsidhar VelchetiTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Sagar RakshitTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Michael YangUniversity Hospital Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Frank JaconoLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Robert GilkesonUniversity Hospital Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Philip LindenUniversity Hospital Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Anant MadabhushiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.

Funding

Computerized histologic image predictor of cancer outcomeR01CA202752 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, GANESAN, SHRIDAR · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
MR Fingerprinting and Computerized Decision Support for Prostate CancerR01CA208236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GULANI, VIKAS, PONSKY, LEE EVAN · 2017 to 2022
$3.0M
Pathology Image Informatics Platform for visualization, analysis and managementU24CA199374 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Comprehensive quantitative ultrafast 3D liver MRIR01DK098503 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GULANI, VIKAS, SEIBERLICH, NICOLE · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
Histologic image-based aggressiveness prediction in p16+ oropharyngeal carcinomaR21CA179327 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2014 to 2015
$389k
Computerized morphologic-molecular predictor of progression in DCISR21CA195152 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BADVE, SUNIL S., MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2016
$388k
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITIESC06RR012463 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTINA, KENNETH L · 1997 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202752NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208236NCI NIH HHS R21 CA179327NCI NIH HHS R21 CA195152NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012463NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenocarcinomas and active granulomas can both have a spiculated appearance on computed tomography (CT) and both are often fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avid on positron emission tomography (PET) scan, making them difficult to distinguish. Consequently, patients with benign granulomas are often subjected to invasive surgical biopsies or resections. In this study, quantitative vessel tortuosity (QVT), a novel CT imaging biomarker to distinguish between benign granulomas and adenocarcinomas on routine non-contrast lung CT scans is introduced. Our study comprised of CT scans of 290 patients from two different institutions, one cohort for training (N = 145) and the other (N = 145) for independent validation. In conjunction with a machine learning classifier, the top informative and stable QVT features yielded an area under receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of 0.85 in the independent validation set. On the same cohort, the corresponding AUCs for two human experts including a radiologist and a pulmonologist were found to be 0.61 and 0.60, respectively. QVT features also outperformed well known shape and textural radiomic features which had a maximum AUC of 0.73 (p-value = 0.002), as well as features learned using a convolutional neural network AUC = 0.76 (p-value = 0.028). Our results suggest that QVT features could potentially serve as a non-invasive imaging biomarker to distinguish granulomas from adenocarcinomas on non-contrast CT scans.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overBlood VesselsDatasets as TopicDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGranulomaHumansLungLung Diseases, FungalLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography

Identifiers

PMID30327507
PMCPMC6191462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.