Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30327419›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Receptive Field Properties of Koniocellular On/Off Neurons in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of Marmoset Monkeys.

Calvin D Eiber, Abrar S Rahman, Alexander N J Pietersen, Natalie Zeater, Bogdan Dreher, Samuel G Solomon, Paul R Martin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Gaining the system: limits to compensating color deficiencies through post-receptoral gain changes.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2023
    Article
  9. Retinorecipient areas in the common marmoset (Frontiers in neural circuits · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Escaping the nocturnal bottleneck, and the evolution of the dorsal and ventral streams of visual processing in primates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Role of Feedback Connections in Central Visual Processing.Annual review of vision science · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Calvin D EiberSave Sight Institute.ORCID 0000-0002-8240-2649
Abrar S RahmanSchool of Medical Sciences.
Alexander N J PietersenSave Sight Institute.
Natalie ZeaterSave Sight Institute.
Bogdan DreherSchool of Medical Sciences.
Samuel G SolomonAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia, and.ORCID 0000-0001-5321-0288
Paul R MartinSave Sight Institute, prmartin@physiol.usyd.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5166-9658
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The koniocellular (K) layers of the primate dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus house a variety of visual receptive field types, not all of which have been fully characterized. Here we made single-cell recordings targeted to the K layers of diurnal New World monkeys (marmosets). A subset of recorded cells was excited by both increments and decrements of light intensity (on/off-cells). Histological reconstruction of the location of these cells confirmed that they are segregated to K layers; we therefore refer to these cells as K-on/off cells. The K-on/off cells show high contrast sensitivity, strong bandpass spatial frequency tuning, and their response magnitude is strongly reduced by stimuli larger than the excitatory receptive field (silent suppressive surrounds). Stationary counterphase gratings evoke unmodulated spike rate increases or frequency-doubled responses in K-on/off cells; such responses are largely independent of grating spatial phase. The K-on/off cells are not orientation or direction selective. Some (but not all) properties of K-on/off cells are consistent with those of local-edge-detector/impressed-by-contrast cells reported in studies of cat retina and geniculate, and broad-thorny ganglion cells recorded in macaque monkey retina. The receptive field properties of K-on/off cells and their preferential location in the ventral K layers (K1 and K2) make them good candidates for the direct projection from geniculate to extrastriate cortical area MT/V5. If so, they could contribute to visual information processing in the dorsal ("where" or "action") visual stream.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCallithrixGeniculate BodiesNeuronsPhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual Fieldslateral geniculate nucleusprimatevision

Identifiers

PMID30327419
PMCPMC6596204
OpenAlexW2895888650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.