Trial reportBMJ open2018
Proficiency-based progression training: an 'end to end' model for decreasing error applied to achievement of effective epidural analgesia during labour: a randomised control study.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Protocol for Development and Validation of Metrics for Conventional Lumbar Epidural Catheter Placement for Labor Analgesia in Obstetric Patients
The Effect of Metrics Based Performance Based Progression in Provision of Labor Epidural Analgesia on Clinical Performance and Clinical Outcome
Proficiency Based Progression Training Versus the Halsted's Model for a Robotic Vesico-urethral Anastomosis on an Avian Tissue Model: a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter and Blinded Clinical Trial: the PROVESA Trial
Safety Huddle Performance: The Effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary, Proficiency-based, Team Simulation Programme to Improve Communication and Reduce Patient Harm (PROTECT)
Proficiency Based Progression Training Versus Traditional Training During a Robotic Emergency Conversion Due to a Vessel Injury in a Simulated Setting: a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial: The T-REC Trial
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Proficiency-based training and evidence-based methodology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BJU international · 2026Pooled it
- Randomised trial on the economic impact of proficiency-based progression vs conventional robotic surgical training.BJU international · 2026Trial
- Proficiency based progression simulation training significantly reduces utility strikes; A prospective, randomized and blinded study.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Proficiency-based simulation training in healthcare - a scoping review protocol.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Review
- Challenges in Surgical Training in the United Kingdom and Potential Solutions: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Training and assessment of skills in neuraxial space access: a scoping review of educational approaches to lumbar puncture, epidural anaesthesia, and spinal anaesthesia.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- International expert consensus on a structured approach to training for cryoballoon-based ablation for atrial fibrillation procedure using performance metrics.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- Discrimination, Reliability, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Robotic Surgical Proficiency Assessment With Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills and Binary Scoring Metrics: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023Article
- Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Metric-Based Simulation Training to Proficiency for Endovascular Thrombectomy in Ischemic Stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Development and validation of the objective assessment of robotic suturing and knot tying skills for chicken anastomotic model.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): results from the ERUS Scientific and Educational Working Groups Metrics Initiative.BJU international · 2021Article
- European expert consensus on a structured approach to training robotic-assisted low anterior resection using performance metrics.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2020Article
- Personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic (Letter #1).Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2020Article
- Validation studies of virtual reality simulation performance metrics for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2019Article
- Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2018.The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraining procedural skills using proficiency-based progression (PBP) methodology has consistently resulted in error reduction. We hypothesised that implementation of metric-based PBP training and a valid assessment tool would decrease the failure rate of epidural analgesia during labour when compared to standard simulation-based training.
methodsDetailed, procedure-specific metrics for labour epidural catheter placement were developed based on carefully elicited expert input. Proficiency was defined using criteria derived from clinical performance of experienced practitioners. A PBP curriculum was developed to train medical personnel on these specific metrics and to eliminate errors in a simulation environment.Seventeen novice anaesthetic trainees were randomly allocated to undergo PBP training (Group P) or simulation only training (Group S). Following training, data from the first 10 labour epidurals performed by each participant were recorded. The primary outcome measure was epidural failure rate.
resultsA total of 74 metrics were developed and validated. The inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the derived assessment tool was 0.88. Of 17 trainees recruited, eight were randomly allocated to group S and six to group P (three trainees did not complete the study). Data from 140 clinical procedures were collected. The incidence of epidural failure was reduced by 54% with PBP training (28.7% in Group S vs 13.3% in Group P, absolute risk reduction 15.4% with 95% CI 2% to 28.8%, p=0.04).
conclusionProcedure-specific metrics developed for labour epidural catheter placement discriminated the performance of experts and novices with an IRR of 0.88. Proficiency-based progression training resulted in a lower incidence of epidural failure compared to simulation only training. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02179879. NCT02185079; Post-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.