Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30327345›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Flow stimuli reveal ecologically appropriate responses in mouse visual cortex.

Luciano Dyballa, Mahmood S Hoseini, Maria C Dadarlat, Steven W Zucker, Michael P Stryker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Population encoding of stimulus features along the visual hierarchy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Population encoding of stimulus features along the visual hierarchy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luciano DyballaDepartment of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.ORCID 0000-0003-1996-2173
Mahmood S HoseiniCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0444.ORCID 0000-0002-3139-0561
Maria C DadarlatCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0444.ORCID 0000-0001-9163-2246
Steven W ZuckerDepartment of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.ORCID 0000-0002-2205-6895
Michael P StrykerCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0444; stryker@phy.ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1546-5831
University of California, San Francisco · USYale University · US

Funding

DEVELOPMENT &PLASTICITY OF THE VISUAL SYSTEMR01EY002874 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STRYKER, MICHAEL P · 1986 to 2022
$6.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessments of the mouse visual system based on spatial-frequency analysis imply that its visual capacity is low, with few neurons responding to spatial frequencies greater than 0.5 cycles per degree. However, visually mediated behaviors, such as prey capture, suggest that the mouse visual system is more precise. We introduce a stimulus class-visual flow patterns-that is more like what the mouse would encounter in the natural world than are sine-wave gratings but is more tractable for analysis than are natural images. We used 128-site silicon microelectrodes to measure the simultaneous responses of single neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) of alert mice. While holding temporal-frequency content fixed, we explored a class of drifting patterns of black or white dots that have energy only at higher spatial frequencies. These flow stimuli evoke strong visually mediated responses well beyond those predicted by spatial-frequency analysis. Flow responses predominate in higher spatial-frequency ranges (0.15-1.6 cycles per degree), many are orientation or direction selective, and flow responses of many neurons depend strongly on sign of contrast. Many cells exhibit distributed responses across our stimulus ensemble. Together, these results challenge conventional linear approaches to visual processing and expand our understanding of the mouse's visual capacity to behaviorally relevant ranges.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroelectrodesNeuronsOrientationPhotic StimulationSpace PerceptionVisual Cortexflow moviemousereceptive fieldspatial frequencyvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID30327345
PMCPMC6217439
OpenAlexW2950135637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.