Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30327288›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

Design Rationale and Performance Evaluation of the Wavelet Health Wristband: Benchtop Validation of a Wrist-Worn Physiological Signal Recorder.

Onur Dur, Colleen Rhoades, Man Suen Ng, Ragwa Elsayed, Reinier van Mourik, Maulik D Majmudar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Wearable Photoplethysmography for Cardiovascular Monitoring.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Onur Dur *Wavelet Health, Mountain View, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1443-8794
Colleen RhoadesWavelet Health, Mountain View, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8320-2200
Man Suen NgWavelet Health, Mountain View, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5807-0210
Ragwa ElsayedBiomedical Engineering, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8632-4131
Reinier van Mourik *Wavelet Health, Mountain View, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5941-6241
Maulik D MajmudarHealthcare Transformation Lab, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8894-7981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable and connected health devices along with the recent advances in mobile and cloud computing provide a continuous, convenient-to-patient, and scalable way to collect personal health data remotely. The Wavelet Health platform and the Wavelet wristband have been developed to capture multiple physiological signals and to derive biometrics from these signals, including resting heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), and respiration rate (RR).

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the biometric estimates and signal quality of the wristband.

methodsMeasurements collected from 35 subjects using the Wavelet wristband were compared with simultaneously recorded electrocardiogram and spirometry measurements.

resultsThe HR, HRV SD of normal-to-normal intervals, HRV root mean square of successive differences, and RR estimates matched within 0.7 beats per minute (SD 0.9), 7 milliseconds (SD 10), 11 milliseconds (SD 12), and 1 breaths per minute (SD 1) mean absolute deviation of the reference measurements, respectively. The quality of the raw plethysmography signal collected by the wristband, as determined by the harmonic-to-noise ratio, was comparable with that obtained from measurements from a finger-clip plethysmography device.

conclusionsThe accuracy of the biometric estimates and high signal quality indicate that the wristband photoplethysmography device is suitable for performing pulse wave analysis and measuring vital signs.

Indexed as

benchmarkingmonitoring, ambulatoryphotoplethysmographyvital signswearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID30327288
PMCPMC6231731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.