Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30326969›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2018

Shedding light on conditions for the successful passive dissemination of recommendations in primary care: a mixed methods study.

Isabelle Vedel, Melanie Le Berre, Nadia Sourial, Geneviève Arsenault-Lapierre, Howard Bergman, Liette Lapointe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isabelle VedelLady Davis Institute of Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Côte-Sainte-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada. isabelle.vedel@mcgill.ca.
Melanie Le BerreLady Davis Institute of Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Côte-Sainte-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Nadia SourialDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Côte-des-Neiges Road, 3rd floor, Montreal, Quebec, H3S 1Z1, Canada.
Geneviève Arsenault-LapierreLady Davis Institute of Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Côte-Sainte-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Howard BergmanLady Davis Institute of Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Côte-Sainte-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Liette LapointeDesautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, 1001 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1G5, Canada.

Funding

CIHR XDM-122032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPassive dissemination of information in healthcare refers to the publication or mailing of newly established guidelines or recommendations. It is one of the least costly knowledge translation activities. This approach is generally considered to be ineffective or to result in only small changes in practice. Recent research, however, suggests that passive dissemination could, under certain conditions, result in modifications of practice, similar to more active dissemination approaches. The objective of our study was to uncover the conditions associated with the change in primary care practice, namely Family Medicine Groups (FMGs) in Quebec (Canada), following the passive dissemination of recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (AD).

methodsWe used a three-step, innovative, convergent mixed methods design based on a multiple case study in eight FMGs. Two studies were conducted in parallel: (1) a before and after retrospective chart review and a cluster analysis of FMGs performed on two clinical performance indicators-the rate of AD diagnosis and the quality of follow-up care; (2) a qualitative descriptive study using interviews and focus groups with FMG clinicians and healthcare managers. The results were integrated using joint displays.

resultsAfter the passive dissemination of the recommendations, some FMGs started to implement the recommendations while other FMGs did not change their practice with respect to the AD diagnosis rate and quality of follow-up care. Three interrelated conditions were identified for the successful passive dissemination of clinical recommendations: (1) FMG clinicians with a moderate to high baseline expertise and confidence, which was linked to their existing collaboration with hospital-based specialists in dementia and their motivation; (2) the presence of a self-identified champion (individual champion or collective championship) in the FMGs taking the lead, motivating the clinical staff or organizing training; (3) the availability of sufficient clinical staff enabled these two conditions to have an impact on the implementation of recommendations through passive dissemination.

conclusionsPassive dissemination of clinical recommendations, a low-cost knowledge translation approach, may lead to practice change under some specific conditions. More active dissemination efforts may only be needed in sites where these conditions are absent.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseDementiaFamily PracticeFemaleHumansImplementation ScienceInformation DisseminationMalePractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchQuebecRetrospective StudiesAlzheimer’s disease and related dementia, knowledge translationMixed methodPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID30326969
PMCPMC6192363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.