Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30326942›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2018

The burden of stroke in Brazil in 2016: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study findings.

Nathalia Matos de Santana, Francisco Winter Dos Santos Figueiredo, Diego Monteiro de Melo Lucena, Fernando Mayo Soares, Fernando Adami, Luciana de Carvalho Pádua Cardoso, João Antonio Correa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cardiovascular Statistics - Brazil 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Predictors of prolonged hospital stay in a Comprehensive Stroke Unit.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathalia Matos de SantanaFaculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil.
Francisco Winter Dos Santos FigueiredoLaboratório de Epidemiologia e Análise de Dados, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil.
Diego Monteiro de Melo LucenaLaboratório de Epidemiologia e Análise de Dados, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil. lucenadiego@hotmail.com.
Fernando Mayo SoaresLaboratório de Epidemiologia e Análise de Dados, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil.
Fernando AdamiLaboratório de Epidemiologia e Análise de Dados, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil.
Luciana de Carvalho Pádua CardosoFaculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil.
João Antonio CorreaDisciplina de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the epidemiological stroke data of Brazil according to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study in 2016 and secondary data from the GBD database.

resultsThe highest percentage of deaths due to stroke in general occurred in individuals aged 70 years or over (60.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 59.9-60.5%) followed by that in men (52.9%; 95% CI 52.6-53.2%). Ischemic stroke was the most common type, accounting for 61.8% (95% CI 61.5-62.1%) of deaths due to stroke in 2016. Most of the epidemiological indicators (incidence, prevalence, mortality-to-incidence ratio, mortality, disability-adjusted life years, years lost due to disability, and years of life lost) of stroke in general or either type of stroke were higher in men and those aged 70 years or over. Stroke data in Brazil are a major concern and represent a real health challenge for the coming decades. Men and individuals aged 70 years or older appear to represent the groups with the highest epidemiological parameters and risk for the various stroke outcomes. However, this does not mean the female data are irrelevant, which, although representing a lower risk than the male data, also raise the need for policies aimed at prevention and improvement in the treatment of stroke and its sequelae.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBrain IschemiaBrazilFemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSex FactorsBrazilEpidemiologyStroke

Identifiers

PMID30326942
PMCPMC6192154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.