Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30326912›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2018

Analysis of definitive chemo-radiotherapy for esophageal cancer with supra-clavicular node metastasis based on CT in a single institutional retrospective study: a propensity score matching analysis.

Hong-Yao Xu, Sheng-Xi Wu, He-San Luo, Chu-Yun Chen, Lian-Xing Lin, He-Cheng Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Role of precision imaging in esophageal cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hong-Yao XuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Shantou Central Hospital (The Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University), Shantou, 515031, China. 78318258@qq.com.
Sheng-Xi WuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Shantou Central Hospital (The Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University), Shantou, 515031, China.
He-San LuoDepartment of Radiotherapy, Shantou Central Hospital (The Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University), Shantou, 515031, China.
Chu-Yun ChenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Shantou Central Hospital (The Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University), Shantou, 515031, China.
Lian-Xing LinDepartment of Radiotherapy, Shantou Central Hospital (The Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University), Shantou, 515031, China.
He-Cheng HuangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Shantou Central Hospital (The Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University), Shantou, 515031, China.
Shantou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2017A030307011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic value of supra-clavicular lymph node (SCLN) metastases in esophageal cancer (EC) is still not clear.

methodFrom January 2009 to December 2015, a survival analysis was performed to retrospectively identify the prognostic value of SCLN metastasis on survival on 751 patients with EC treated with definitive chemo-radiotherapy (dCRT).

resultsThe median follow-up duration for living patients was 56.6 months. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 16.6 months. Patients with SCLN metastasis had a much poorer prognosis for OS (χ

conclusionFor patients with cervical or upper thoracic EC, metastasis in SCLN should be considered to be regional lymph nodes and treated with curative intent if the total number of lymph nodes is limited. However, for patients with middle or lower thoracic EC, metastasis should be considered to be a higher level N stage or M1 stage, and it is thus necessary to provide consolidation chemotherapy after dCRT.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyClavicleEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTomography, X-Ray ComputedDefinitive chemo-radiotherapyEsophageal cancerSupra-clavicular lymph node

Identifiers

PMID30326912
PMCPMC6192107
OpenAlexW2896922604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.