Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30326893›Full record

SynthesisRespiratory research2018

High-flow nasal cannula in adults with acute respiratory failure and after extubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhiheng Xu, Yimin Li, Jianmeng Zhou, Xi Li, Yongbo Huang, Xiaoqing Liu, Karen E A Burns, Nanshan Zhong, Haibo Zhang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Respiratory research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04507425 (High Flow Nasal Cannula With Noninvasive Ventilation and Its Effect on High Risk Trauma Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04507425 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

High Flow Nasal Cannula With Noninvasive Ventilation and Its Effect on High Risk Trauma Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OklahomaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled6ConditionsAcute Respiratory FailureArmsStandard of Care - Nasal Cannula, High-flow nasal cannula, HFNC plus non-invasive ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhiheng XuState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute for Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China.
Yimin LiState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute for Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China.
Jianmeng ZhouState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute for Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China.
Xi LiState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute for Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China.
Yongbo HuangState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute for Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoqing LiuState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute for Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China.
Karen E A BurnsInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. BurnsK@smh.ca.
Nanshan ZhongState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute for Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China.
Haibo ZhangState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute for Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China. zhangh@smh.ca.
State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research CCl132569Canadian Institute of Health Research FDN143285National Natural Science Foundation of China 81370177National Natural Science Foundation of China 81490534National Natural Science Foundation of China 81770079National Science and Technology Major Project 2017ZX10204401003the Chief Scientist Project of Yangcheng Scholar in Guangzhou 1201541642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) can be used as an initial support strategy for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) and after extubation. However, no clear evidence exists to support or oppose HFNC use in clinical practice. We summarized the effects of HFNC, compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV), on important outcomes including treatment failure and intubation/reintubation rates in adult patients with ARF and after extubation.

methodsWe searched 4 electronic databases (Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of HFNC with either COT or NIV on rates of 1) treatment failure and 2) intubation/reintubation in adult critically ill patients.

resultsWe identified 18 RCTs (n = 4251 patients) in pooled analyses. As a primary mode of support, HFNC treatment reduced the risk of treatment failure [Odds Ratio (OR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.98; p = 0.04; I

conclusionsHFNC was superior to COT in reducing treatment failure when used as a primary support strategy and in reducing rates of extubation failure and reintubation when used after extubation. In few trials, HFNC reduced intubation rate compared to NIV when used as initial support but demonstrated no beneficial effects after extubation.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationCannulaHumansOxygen Inhalation TherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Distress SyndromeConventional oxygen therapyExtubationNoninvasive ventilation

Identifiers

PMID30326893
PMCPMC6192218
OpenAlexW2898018304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.