Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30326891›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

The impact of prescriptions audit and feedback for antibiotic use in rural clinics: interrupted time series with segmented regression analysis.

Li Zhen, Chenggang Jin, Hao-Nan Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li ZhenSchool of Public Affairs, Xiamen University, Room 308 Chengzhi Building, 422 Siming South Road, Siming District, Xiamen, Fujian Province, 361005, People's Republic of China.
Chenggang JinSchool of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, 2008 North Main Building, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekouwai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, People's Republic of China. cgjin2005@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7172-2199
Hao-Nan XuSchool of Public Affairs, Xiamen University, Room 308 Chengzhi Building, 422 Siming South Road, Siming District, Xiamen, Fujian Province, 361005, People's Republic of China.
Xiamen University · CNBeijing Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProblems of irrational antibiotic use by prescribers are ongoing and have escalated following reductions in the cost of essential drugs policy. In an attempt to improve prescribing practices for village doctors and rational use of essential drugs, a program designed to audit and monitor drug use was established. However, the effects of the program to control antibiotic resistance and changing the village doctors' prescribing behaviors remain largely unknown. This study measured the effect of the program on levels of antibiotic use.

methodData was collected covering a 22-month period, before, during and after the program was implemented in rural clinics. Segmented regression analysis with interrupted time series (ITS) data was used to examine whether there had been a significant interaction with the onset of the program in September 2011 and levels of antibiotic use from November 2010 to August 2012. Both serial and 12-month lag autocorrelations were controlled for.

resultsA noticeable drop about 6.15% per month (95% CI: -13.36%; 1.06%, P = 0.089) for the antibiotic use in outpatients, which is lower of effect size assuming that the program has the immediate impact of the program were captured for the immediate effect of the program. Meanwhile, levels of antibiotic use would have continued to decrease by 1.12% per month (P = 0.034) as they did in the absence of the program.

conclusionThe central finding was that the prescription audit and feedback program was associated with significant decreases (P = 0.034) in antibiotic use after its implementation.

Indexed as

Drug Utilization ReviewAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug PrescriptionsFeedbackHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMedical AuditPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription Drug OveruseRegression AnalysisRural Health ServicesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic useInterrupted time seriesPrescription audit and feedbackSegmented regression analysis

Identifiers

PMID30326891
PMCPMC6192162
OpenAlexW2897104938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.