Trial reportBMC psychiatry2018
A qualitative analysis of suicidal psychiatric inpatients views and expectations of psychological therapy to counter suicidal thoughts, acts and deaths.
Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- The relationship between the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and suicidal experiences: A systematic review.Clinical psychology & psychotherapy · 2022Pooled it
- Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Experiences of Suicidality Following Discharge From a Mental Health Inpatient Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyPooled it
- THRIVE: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Social Validity of a Brief Recovery-Focused Intervention in Crisis Stabilization Centers.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2025Trial
- Acceptability of a novel suicide prevention psychological therapy for people who experience non-affective psychosis.Psychology and psychotherapy · 2023Trial
- Trial
- A mixed-methods evaluation of a large-scale online gatekeeper training to prevent youth suicides in the Netherlands.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Effect of crisis resolution team treatment on crisis experience and crisis coping: a multicenter pre-post study in Norway.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Umbrella review of psychosocial and ward-based interventions to reduce self-harm and suicide risks in in-patient mental health settings.BJPsych open · 2025Review
- Developing a consensus of recovery from suicidal ideations and behaviours: A Delphi study with experts by experience.PloS one · 2023Article
- Facilitators and barriers to implementation of suicide prevention interventions: Scoping review.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- The Relationship between the Therapeutic Alliance and Suicidal Experiences in People with Psychosis Receiving Therapy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- A psychological intervention for suicide applied to non-affective psychosis: the CARMS (Cognitive AppRoaches to coMbatting Suicidality) randomised controlled trial protocol.BMC psychiatry · 2020Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of suicide prevention therapy on acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial.BJPsych open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuicide is a global problem and suicidal behavior is common in acute psychiatric wards. Inpatient suicides regularly occur with 10.4/100,000 such deaths recorded in the UK in 2016. Inpatient suicides are potentially the most avoidable of all suicides as inpatients have 24-h staff contact. Current inpatient treatment prioritizes maintenance of physical safety by observation, medication and general supportive measures, however efficacious and effective specific treatments are lacking. Psychological treatments have a growing evidence base for suicide prevention yet provision of inpatient therapy is uncommon. The present qualitative study aimed to understand the patient acceptability issues by investigating suicidal inpatients views and expectations of a novel suicide-focussed cognitive behavioural psychological therapy which was nested alongside a pilot clinical trial of the intervention.
methodsThematic analysis of semi-structured individual qualitative interviews with twenty suicidal psychiatric inpatients to investigate their views and expectations about ward-based suicide-focused psychological treatment.
resultsTwo main themes were identified. The first, 'A therapy that works', revealed inpatients' views of the necessary components for effective ward-based suicide-focused psychological therapy. The second, 'Concerns about in-patient suicide-focused therapy', depicted their fears about engaging in this treatment. Results suggested that suicide-focused psychological therapy was cautiously welcomed by inpatients' whose narratives expressed their needs, priorities and concerns. Further data analysis enabled formation of a user-informed model of suicide-focussed psychological therapy which offers guidance for researchers and clinicians.
conclusionsWe conclude that hospitalization of suicidal individuals offers a critical opportunity to intervene with effective treatment to preserve life and that suicide-focussed psychological therapy is likely to be well received by suicidal inpatients warranting further testing with a sufficiently powered definitive trial. It is important that provision of ward-based psychological therapy for suicidal inpatients addresses the considerable context-specific challenges inherent in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 17890126 , Registry: UK Clinical Trials Gateway, Date of registration: 22/04/15, Date of enrolment of first participant to the trial: 20/05/14 (retrospectively registered).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.