Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30326869›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with caesarean section delivery in Southern Ghana: evidence from INDEPTH Network member site.

Alfred Kwesi Manyeh, Alberta Amu, David Etsey Akpakli, John Williams, Margaret Gyapong

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Strengthening caesarean birth: Sub-Saharan Africa health system evaluation: Scoping review.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alfred Kwesi ManyehDodowa Health Research Centre, P. O. Box. DD1, Dodowa, Accra, Ghana. alfredmanyeh4u@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7005-5707
Alberta AmuDodowa Health Research Centre, P. O. Box. DD1, Dodowa, Accra, Ghana.
David Etsey AkpakliDodowa Health Research Centre, P. O. Box. DD1, Dodowa, Accra, Ghana.
John WilliamsDodowa Health Research Centre, P. O. Box. DD1, Dodowa, Accra, Ghana.
Margaret GyapongDodowa Health Research Centre, P. O. Box. DD1, Dodowa, Accra, Ghana.
Dodowa Health Research Centre · GHUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GHUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, caesarean section rates continue to evoke worldwide concern because of their steady increase, lack of consensus on the appropriate caesarean section rate and the associated short- and long-term risks. This study sought to identify the rate of caesarean section and associated factors in two districts in rural southern Ghana.

methodsPregnancy, birth, and socio-demographic information of 4948 women who gave birth between 2011 and 2013 were obtained from the database of Dodowa Health and Demographic Surveillance System. The rate of C-section was determined and the associations between independent and dependent variables were explored using logistic regression. The analyses were done in STATA 14.2 at 95% confidence interval.

resultsThe overall C-section rate for the study period was 6.59%. Women aged 30-34 years were more than twice likely to have C-section compared to those < 20 year (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.20-3.90). However, women aged 34 years and above were more than thrice likely to undergo C-section compared to those < 20 year (OR: 3.73, 95% CI: 1.45-5.17). The odds of having C-section was 65 and 79% higher for participants with Primary and Junior High level schooling respectively (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.08-2.51, OR:1.79, 95%CI: 1.19-2.70). The likelihood of having C-section delivery reduced by 60, 37, and 35% for women with parities 2, 3 and 3+ respectively (OR:0.60, 95% CI: 0.43-0.83, OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.25-0.56, OR:0.35, 95% CI: 0.25-0.54). There were increased odds of 36, 52, 83% for women who belong to poorer, middle, and richer wealth quintiles respectively (OR: 1.36, 95%CI: 0.85-2.18, OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.97-2.37, OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.20-2.80). Participants who belonged to the richest wealth quintile were more than 2 times more likely to have C-section delivery (OR: 2.14, 95%CI: 1.43-3.20). The odds of having C-section delivery reduced by 76% for women from Ningo-Prampram district (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59.0.96). Women whose household heads have Junior High level and above of education were 45% more likely to have C-section delivery (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.09-1.93).

conclusionAge of mother, educational level, parity, household socioeconomic status, district of residence, and level of education of household head are associated with caesarean section delivery.

Indexed as

Economic StatusEducational StatusAdultAge FactorsCesarean SectionDatabases, FactualFemaleGhanaHumansInfant, NewbornMaleParityResidence CharacteristicsYoung AdultCaesarean sectionDodowaGhanaINDEPTH network

Identifiers

PMID30326869
PMCPMC6191905
OpenAlexW2896140941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.