ArticleBMC genomics2018
High genomic variability in the plant pathogenic bacterium Pectobacterium parmentieri deciphered from de novo assembled complete genomes.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Novel Plant Secondary Metabolite-Binding Gene Family Required for Full Virulence in Pectobacterium parvum.Molecular plant pathology · 2026Article
- Pangenomics to understand prophage dynamics in theMicrobial genomics · 2025Article
- Antibiotic Resistance in Plant Pathogenic Bacteria: Recent Data and Environmental Impact of Unchecked Use and the Potential of Biocontrol Agents as an Eco-Friendly Alternative.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Impact of Homologous Recombination on Core Genome Evolution and Host Adaptation of Pectobacterium parmentieri.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Global diversity and distribution of prophages are lineage-specific within the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Characterization and Comparative Genomics Analysis of a New Bacteriophage BUCT610 againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Heterogenicity within the LPS Structure in Relation to the Chosen Genomic and Physiological Features of the Plant PathogenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Analysis of the Taxonomy, Synteny, and Virulence Factors for Soft Rot PathogenFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Genomic characterization of a new phage BUCT541 againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay for the Detection ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Tailed Lytic Bacteriophages of Soft Rot Pectobacteriaceae.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- European Population ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Comparative Genomics, from the Annotated Genome to Valuable Biological Information: A Case Study.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Analysis of the Taxonomy and Pathogenic Factors ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- PacBio-Based Protocol for Bacterial Genome Assembly.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Comparative genomics and pangenome-oriented studies reveal high homogeneity of the agronomically relevant enterobacterial plant pathogen Dickeya solani.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Single gene enables plant pathogenic Pectobacterium to overcome host-specific chemical defence.Molecular plant pathology · 2020Article
- The Versatility of SMRT Sequencing.Genes · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPectobacterium parmentieri is a newly established species within the plant pathogenic family Pectobacteriaceae. Bacteria belonging to this species are causative agents of diseases in economically important crops (e.g. potato) in a wide range of different environmental conditions, encountered in Europe, North America, Africa, and New Zealand. Severe disease symptoms result from the activity of P. parmentieri virulence factors, such as plant cell wall degrading enzymes. Interestingly, we observe significant phenotypic differences among P. parmentieri isolates regarding virulence factors production and the abilities to macerate plants. To establish the possible genomic basis of these differences, we sequenced 12 genomes of P. parmentieri strains (10 isolated in Poland, 2 in Belgium) with the combined use of Illumina and PacBio approaches. De novo genome assembly was performed with the use of SPAdes software, while annotation was conducted by NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline.
resultsThe pan-genome study was performed on 15 genomes (12 de novo assembled and three reference strains: P. parmentieri CFBP 8475
conclusionsWe can hypothesize that a large number of the genes in the dispensable genome and significant genomic variation among P. parmentieri strains could be the basis of the potential wide host range and widespread diffusion of P. parmentieri. The obtained data on the structure and gene content of P. parmentieri strains enabled us to speculate on the importance of high genomic plasticity for P. parmentieri adaptation to different environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.