Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30326827›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2018

The Shiny Balancer - software and imbalance criteria for optimally balanced treatment allocation in small RCTs and cRCTs.

Thomas Grischott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The new injury severity score underestimates true injury severity in a resource-constrained setting.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas GrischottInstitute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland. thomas.grischott@usz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-1564-5296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn randomised controlled trials with only few randomisation units, treatment allocation may be challenging if balanced distributions of many covariates or baseline outcome measures are desired across all treatment groups. Both traditional approaches, stratified randomisation and allocation by minimisation, have their own limitations. A third method for achieving balance consists of randomly choosing from a preselected list of sufficiently balanced allocations. As with minimisation, this method requires that heterogeneity between treatment groups is measured by specified imbalance metrics. Although certain imbalance measures are more commonly used than others, to the author's knowledge there is no generally accepted "gold standard", neither for categorical and even less so for continuous variables.

methodsAn intuitive and easily accessible web-based software tool was developed which allows for balancing multiple variables of different types and using various imbalance metrics. Different metrics were compared in a simulation study.

resultsUsing simulated data, it could be shown that for categorical variables, χ

conclusionThe Shiny Balancer offers the possibility to visually explore the balancing properties of several well established or newly suggested imbalance metrics, and its use is particularly advocated in clinical studies with few randomisation units, as it is typically the case in cluster randomised trials.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationSoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansInternetOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignCluster randomised trialCovariate-adaptiveImbalance measureImbalance metricMinimisationRandomisationTreatment allocation

Identifiers

PMID30326827
PMCPMC6192202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.