Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30326668›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Environmental Health in Perinatal and Early Childhood: Awareness, Representation, Knowledge and Practice of Southern France Perinatal Health Professionals.

Claire Sunyach, Barbara Antonelli, Sophie Tardieu, Michele Marcot, Jeanne Perrin, Florence Bretelle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Knowledge and attitudes of pregnant women about endocrine disruptors.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claire SunyachAix Marseille, Avignon Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, 13284 Marseille, France. c.sunyach@gmail.com.
Barbara AntonelliRéseau Méditerranée, Réseau de Périnatalité PACA, Corse, Monaco, 13015 Marseille, France. barbara.antonelli@hotmail.fr.
Sophie TardieuSanté Publique, Évaluation Médicale, AP-HM, Aix Marseille Université, 13284 Marseille, France. sophie.tardieu@ap-hm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-1835-8153
Michele MarcotRéseau Méditerranée, Réseau de Périnatalité PACA, Corse, Monaco, 13015 Marseille, France. michele.marcot@reseauperinatmed.fr.
Jeanne PerrinAix Marseille, Avignon Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, 13284 Marseille, France. jeanne.perrin@univ-amu.fr.
Florence BretellePôle Femmes-Parents-Enfants, Centre Pluridisciplinaire de Diagnostic Prénatal, AP-HM, 13915 Marseille, France. florence.bretelle@ap-hm.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exposure of adults of reproductive age as well as pregnant women and children to environmental contaminants is of particular concern, as it can impact fertility, in utero development, pregnancy outcomes and child health. Consequently, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and international societies advocate including Environmental Health (EH) in perinatal care, yet perinatal health professionals (HPs) hardly put these recommendations into practice. In 2017, a cross-sectional study was performed in a large panel of perinatal HPs in south-eastern France with the aim of painting a picture of their current attitudes, representation, knowledge, and training expectations. Quantitative and qualitative information was collected via auto-questionnaire. Questionnaires were completed by 962 participants, mainly midwives (41.1%), physicians (25.6%) and nursery nurses (11%). Indoor/outdoor air quality and endocrine disruptors were the best-mastered topics, whereas electromagnetic fields and diet gave rise to unsure responses. Overall, perinatal HPs were ill-trained and -informed about the reproductive risks linked to daily environmental exposure. HPs reported scarce knowledge, fear of patient reaction and lack of solutions as the main barriers to providing information regarding EH to the public. Our findings highlight the need to set up EH training programmes focused on scientific knowledge and to provide simple messages and tips to help perinatal HPs deliver advice to populations to mitigate exposure to environmental toxicants.

Indexed as

Child HealthEnvironmental HealthHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePerinatal CareAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmental ExposureFemaleFranceHealth PersonnelHumansMalePregnancyPregnant PeopleSurveys and Questionnairesattitudesenvironmental healthenvironmental toxicantsperceptionperinatal health professionalspracticespreventive attitudereproductive health

Identifiers

PMID30326668
PMCPMC6211056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.