Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30326141›Full record

ArticlePaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2019

Short interpregnancy interval and poor fetal growth: Evaluating the role of pregnancy intention.

Jessica Liauw, Geir W Jacobsen, Tricia L Larose, Jennifer A Hutcheon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Effect of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus History on Future Pregnancy Behaviors: The Mutaba'ah Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica LiauwDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1573-5574
Geir W JacobsenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Tricia L LaroseDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Jennifer A HutcheonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0502-3423

Funding

British Columbia Clinician Investigator Program, CanadaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, USA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated that short interpregnancy interval (the interval between delivery and estimated last menstrual period of a subsequent pregnancy) is associated with small for gestational age birth. It is controversial if this association is causal, as few studies have accounted for likely confounding factors such as unintended pregnancy. We examined the association between interpregnancy interval and infant birthweight, adjusting for pregnancy intention and other socio-economic and obstetrical risk factors.

methodsWe used data from the Scandinavian Successive Small-for-Gestational-Age births study (1986-1988). Birthweight was expressed as a gestational age-standardised z-score.

resultsAmong 1406 women, a trend towards lower birthweight z-score with short interpregnancy interval was not statistically significant (unadjusted difference in birthweight z-score of -0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.55, 0.05). After adjusting for pregnancy intention, detailed measures of socio-economic status, and other covariates, the estimated magnitude of effect between interpregnancy interval and birthweight z-score was further attenuated (adjusted difference in birthweight z-score of -0.13, 95% CI -0.46, 0.20).

conclusionsIn this cohort study with detailed information on pregnancy intention and socio-economic status, short interpregnancy interval was not associated with lower birthweight. These findings suggest that previously observed associations between short interpregnancy interval and lower birthweight may reflect confounding by socio-economic and/or other unmeasured confounders.

Indexed as

Birth IntervalsAdultBirth WeightFamily Planning ServicesFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHumansInfant, Small for Gestational AgeIntentionPregnancyPregnancy, Unplannedbirth spacingfetal growthfetal growth restrictioninterpregnancy intervalpregnancy intention

Identifiers

PMID30326141
PMCPMC6378596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.