Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30326046›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2018

Incidence and Early Course of Retinopathy of Prematurity: Secondary Analysis of the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (G-ROP) Study.

Graham E Quinn, Gui-Shuang Ying, Edward F Bell, Pamela K Donohue, David Morrison, Lauren A Tomlinson, Gil Binenbaum, G-ROP Study Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP): Are We There Yet?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Graham E QuinnChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gui-Shuang YingScheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Edward F BellDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Pamela K DonohueDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
David MorrisonVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Lauren A TomlinsonChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gil BinenbaumChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
G-ROP Study Group
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USJohns Hopkins University · USOregon Health & Science University · USPenn Presbyterian Medical Center · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Qi N Cui · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (G-ROP) StudiesR01EY021137 · NEI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI BINENBAUM, GIL · 2012 to 2016
$4.3M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The current guidelines for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) detection programs in the United States include a range of birth weights (BWs) and gestational ages and likely require examinations of many premature infants who are at low risk for developing serious retinopathy. Objective: To determine the incidence, onset, and early course of ROP in what to our knowledge is the largest cohort to date that is representative of infants who are undergoing ROP screening. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of data from the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (G-ROP) retrospective cohort study was conducted in 29 hospitals in the United States and Canada between January 2006 and December 2011 and included 7483 infants who underwent serial ROP examinations. Main Outcomes and Measures: Most severe ROP in either eye, classified as no ROP, mild ROP, type 2 ROP, or type 1 ROP (per Early Treatment for ROP Study criteria). Onset at postmenstrual age for zone I disease and stage of ROP, plus disease, and treatment. Results: This study included 7483 infants with a mean (SD) BW of 1099 (259) g and a mean (SD) gestational age of 28 (3) weeks who underwent ROP examinations. Of these, 3224 infants (43.1%) developed ROP, 459 (6.1%) developed type 1 and 472 (6.3%) type 2 ROP, 514 (6.9%) underwent treatment in 1 or both eyes, and 147 (2%) had zone I disease. Additionally, 98.1% of type 1 or 2 ROP cases occurred in infants with a BW of less than 1251 g. Only about half of the eyes (49.4%) were vascularized into zone III by 37 weeks postmenstrual age. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings add to our knowledge of ROP screening as they include all eligible infants, not just high-risk infants as in previous studies. More than 40% of at-risk premature infants develop some stage of ROP, and most retinopathy regresses without treatment. However, approximately 12.5% develop severe ROP, which occurs almost exclusively among infants with a BW of less than 1251 g.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCanadaDisease ProgressionFemaleGestational AgeHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal ScreeningRetinopathy of PrematurityRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30326046
PMCPMC6583045
OpenAlexW2891969356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.