Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30326042›Full record

Trial reportJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2018

Clinical Application of 3-Dimensional Printing Technology for Patients With Nasal Septal Deformities: A Multicenter Study.

Do Hyun Kim, Won-Soo Yun, Jin-Hyung Shim, Keun-Ho Park, Dami Choi, Moon Il Park, Se Hwan Hwang, Sung Won Kim

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Wedge resection combined with 3D-printed polycaprolactone mesh for caudal septal deviation.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Long-term efficacy and safety of 3D printed implant in patients with nasal septal deformities.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  19. Dissection Manual for Open Rhinoseptoplasty in a Silicone Nose Model.Journal of rhinology : official journal of the Korean Rhinologic Society · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Do Hyun KimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Won-Soo YunDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Polytechnic University, Siheung-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea.
Jin-Hyung ShimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Polytechnic University, Siheung-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea.
Keun-Ho ParkDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Polytechnic University, Siheung-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea.
Dami ChoiResearch Institute, T&R Biofab Co Ltd, Siheung-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea.
Moon Il ParkDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Se Hwan HwangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bucheon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Sung Won KimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Studies have shown the controllability and porosity of polycaprolactone as well as the use of 3-dimensional (3-D) printing for nasal reconstruction in animal models. The utility of polycaprolactone with 3-D technology in nasal cartilaginous framework reconstruction in humans remains unknown. Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of 3-D printed, bioresorbable polycaprolactone nasal implants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter clinical trial comprised 20 patients with caudal septal deviations who underwent septoplasty, which used a 3-D printed polycaprolactone mesh, at 2 centers in South Korea. Patients were included if they were aged 18 to 74 years and had nasal septal deviations, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores greater than 20, and persistent nasal obstructions. Twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria, but 2 patients were excluded before the operation. The study was conducted from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: The change in total Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation score between the preoperative examination and the week 12 postoperative examination was the primary outcome. Changes in bilateral nasal cavity minimum cross-sectional area and volume on acoustic rhinometry at weeks 4 and 12 after the operation as well as changes in the nasal cavity cross-sectional area at the osteomeatal unit and nasal septum angle in the paranasal sinus on computed tomography after week 12 were among the secondary outcomes. Results: Of the 20 patients included in the study, 4 (20%) were female, 16 (80%) were male, with a mean (SD) age of 34.95 (11.96) years. The preoperative and week 12 postoperative results revealed significant changes in the minimal cross-sectional areas on acoustic rhinometry (0.41 [SD, 0.39] vs -0.11 [SD, 0.18]; difference, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.61), nasal septum angles on computed tomography (11.22 [SD, 6.57] vs 2.89 [SD, 3.12]; difference, 8.33; 95% CI, 5.08-11.58), and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores (73.50 [SD, 19.88] vs 3.75 [SD, 6.26]; difference, 69.75; 95% CI, 59.22-80.28). The surgeons' convenience level with the procedure was favorable (visual analog scale score [SD], 90.90 [9.45]), and so were the patients' symptom improvements and satisfaction after 12 weeks (visual analog scale score [SD], 88.30 [9.87]). Conclusions and Relevance: The 3-D printed, homogeneous, composite, microporous polycaprolactone nasal implant demonstrated proper mechanical support and thinness with excellent biocompatibility and surgical manipulability. Polycaprolactone may be a clinically biocompatible material for use in various craniofacial reconstructions in the future.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis DesignAbsorbable ImplantsAdultAgedBiocompatible MaterialsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal SeptumPolyestersRepublic of KoreaRhinometry, AcousticRhinoplastyBiocompatible MaterialspolycaprolactonePolyesters

Identifiers

PMID30326042
PMCPMC6583092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.