Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30326014›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of internal medicine2018

β-Blocker Use in Pregnancy and the Risk for Congenital Malformations: An International Cohort Study.

Brian T Bateman, Uffe Heide-Jørgensen, Kristjana Einarsdóttir, Anders Engeland, Kari Furu, Mika Gissler, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz, Helle Kieler, Anna-Maria Lahesmaa-Korpinen, Helen Mogun and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Beta-Blockers for the Treatment of Arrhythmias: Which Drug for Which Arrhythmia? A State-of-the-Art Narrative Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Current Understanding on Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy.International journal of general medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Practical compendium of antiarrhythmic drugs: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Brian T BatemanBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.T.B., K.F.H.).
Uffe Heide-JørgensenAarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (U.H., M.N.).
Kristjana EinarsdóttirUniversity of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland (K.E.).
Anders EngelandNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, and University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway (A.E.).
Kari FuruNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (K.F., R.S.).
Mika GisslerUniversity of Turku, Turku, Finland, and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (M.G., H.K., J.R.).
Sonia Hernandez-DiazHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (S.H.).
Helle KielerUniversity of Turku, Turku, Finland, and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (M.G., H.K., J.R.).
Anna-Maria Lahesmaa-KorpinenNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland (A.L.).
Helen MogunKarolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (H.M.).
Mette NørgaardAarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (U.H., M.N.).
Johan ReutforsUniversity of Turku, Turku, Finland, and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (M.G., H.K., J.R.).
Randi SelmerNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (K.F., R.S.).
Krista F HuybrechtsBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.T.B., K.F.H.).
Helga ZoegaUniversity of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (H.Z.).

Funding

Improved methods to assess the comparative safety of new psychiatric medicationsK01MH099141 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HUYBRECHTS, KRISTA F · 2013 to 2017
$882k
Comparative safety & effectiveness of antihypertensive medications in pregnancyK08HD075831 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BATEMAN, BRIAN THOMAS · 2013 to 2017
$717k
Pregnancy Registries Nested in International Pooled Health Care DatabasesR21HD092879 · NICHD · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HERNANDEZ-DIAZ, SONIA · 2017 to 2018
$478k
NICHD NIH HHS K08 HD075831NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD092879NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH099141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: β-Blockers are a class of antihypertensive medications that are commonly used in pregnancy. Objective: To estimate the risks for major congenital malformations associated with first-trimester exposure to β-blockers. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Health registries in the 5 Nordic countries and the U.S. Medicaid database. Patients: Pregnant women with a diagnosis of hypertension and their offspring. Measurements: First-trimester exposure to β-blockers was assessed. Outcomes were any major congenital malformation, cardiac malformations, cleft lip or palate, and central nervous system (CNS) malformations. Propensity score stratification was used to control for potential confounders. Results: Of 3577 women with hypertensive pregnancies in the Nordic cohort and 14 900 in the U.S. cohort, 682 (19.1%) and 1668 (11.2%), respectively, were exposed to β-blockers in the first trimester. The pooled adjusted relative risk (RR) and risk difference per 1000 persons exposed (RD1000) associated with β-blockers were 1.07 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.30) and 3.0 (CI, -6.6 to 12.6), respectively, for any major malformation; 1.12 (CI, 0.83 to 1.51) and 2.1 (CI, -4.3 to 8.4) for any cardiac malformation; and 1.97 (CI, 0.74 to 5.25) and 1.0 (CI, -0.9 to 3.0) for cleft lip or palate. For CNS malformations, the adjusted RR was 1.37 (CI, 0.58 to 3.25) and the RD1000 was 1.0 (CI, -2.0 to 4.0) (based on U.S. cohort data only). Limitation: Analysis was restricted to live births, exposure was based on dispensed medication, and cleft lip or palate and CNS malformations had few outcomes. Conclusion: The results suggest that maternal use of β-blockers in the first trimester is not associated with a large increase in the risk for overall malformations or cardiac malformations, independent of measured confounders. Primary Funding Source: The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Söderström König Foundation.

Indexed as

Prenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAbnormalities, Drug-InducedAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAntihypertensive AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionInfant, NewbornMedicaidPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularPregnancy Trimester, FirstPropensity ScoreRegistriesAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID30326014
PMCPMC6854680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.