ArticleJAMA oncology2019
Five-Year Risk of Cervical Precancer Following p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stain Triage of HPV-Positive Women.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.
- The association of fungal infection in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2026Pooled it
- Italian guidelines for cervical cancer screening. Multisocietal recommendations on the use of biomarkers in HPV screening with risk-based approach and GRADE methodology.British journal of cancer · 2025Guideline
- Reporting and Assessing the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management.Journal of lower genital tract disease · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of an adsorbent and anti-oxidative vaginal gel on CIN1 and 2, on high-risk HPV, and on p16/Ki-67: a randomized controlled trial.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021Trial
- Review
- Clinical Significance of High-Risk HPV Positivity with Negative Cytology: Can Further Evaluation Be Safely Delayed?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Biology-aligned cervical cancer screening: target-centric biomarkers and next-generation diagnostic platforms.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Health care policy trial of primary human papillomavirus-based cervical screening in Denmark: Comparison of three triage algorithms.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- SOX1/PAX1 Methylation for Triage of HPV-Positive Women in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- A Bayesian Prevalence-Incidence Mixture Model for Screening Outcomes With Misclassification.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Long-Term Prospective Cohort Study of Cervical Cancer Screening Using Triage of Women Who Are Human Papillomavirus-Positive With Dual Stain and Human Papillomavirus Genotyping.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Observational
- Adjunctive role of p16/Ki-67 dual-stain cytology in colposcopy referral pathways for cervical precancer and persistent high-risk HPV infection.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- A prospective observational study on the value of HPV E6/E7 oncoprotein immunocytochemistry for triaging HPV-positive women.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of systemic inflammation- and nutrition-based indices in the prediction of HPV persistence.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Sexual assault and cancer pathways: a scoping review of biomedical and screening outcomes.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Identification of the important role of CA9 in immune infiltration and prognosis in cervical cancer.Future science OA · 2025Article
- p16/ki-67 dual stain triage of individuals positive for HPV to detect cervical precancerous lesions.International journal of cancer · 2025Review
- Closing the Automation Gap: Robust AI for Dual-Stain Cervical Cancer Screening Triage.Research square · 2025Article
- Advances in cervical cancer: current insights and future directions.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: As cervical cancer screening transitions to primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, effective triage and management of HPV-positive women is critical to avoid unnecessary colposcopy referral and associated harms while maintaining high sensitivity for cervical precancer. Triage with p16/Ki-67 dual-stain (DS) testing has shown high sensitivity and specificity for detection of cervical precancers; however, longitudinal studies are needed to determine the long-term risk of precancer following a negative DS result. Objective: To evaluate the longitudinal performance of p16/Ki-67 DS triage for detection of cervical precancer in HPV-positive women over 5 years of follow-up in the context of clinical management thresholds. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective cohort study of HPV-positive women 30 years or older undergoing routine cervical cancer screening in 2012 with HPV and Papanicolaou (hereinafter "cytology") co-testing within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health care system. Follow-up of medical records was conducted through 2017. Exposures: All p16/Ki-67 DS testing was performed on residual SurePath material, and slides were evaluated for p16/Ki-67 positivity. Main Outcomes and Measures: Histological end points were ascertained from the clinical database through 2017. We estimated 5-year cumulative risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades of 2 or worse (≥CIN2) or grades 3 or worse (≥CIN3) by baseline DS and cytology at yearly intervals using Logistic Weibull models. Risks were compared with clinical management thresholds for colposcopy referral and a 1-year return interval. Results: Among the 1549 HPV-positive women in this study, the mean age at enrollment was 42.2 years, and the median follow-up time was 3.7 years (range, 0.2-5.4 years). Positive DS results were associated with significantly higher cumulative 5-year risks of ≥CIN2 compared with abnormal cytology (31.0%; 95% CI, 27.2%-35.3% vs 25.0%; 95% CI, 21.7%-28.7%; P = .03). Women with DS-negative findings had significantly lower 5-year risks of ≥CIN2 compared with women with normal cytology (8.5%; 95% CI, 6.5%-11.1% vs 12.3%; 95% CI, 9.8%-15.4%; P = .04). In DS-negative women, the risks of both ≥CIN2 and ≥CIN3 remained below the colposcopy referral threshold for all 5 years, crossing the 1-year return threshold at 3 years. Conclusions and Relevance: Triage with p16/Ki-67 DS provides better long-term risk stratification than cytology over 5 years. The low risk of cervical precancer in p16/Ki-67 DS-negative women permits safe extension of follow-up intervals for 3 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.