ArticlePloS one2018
DENIS: Solving cardiac electrophysiological simulations with volunteer computing.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac electrophysiological simulations are computationally intensive tasks. The growing complexity of cardiac models, together with the increasing use of large ensembles of models (known as populations of models), make extensive simulation studies unfeasible for regular stand-alone computers. To address this problem, we developed DENIS, a cardiac electrophysiology simulator based on the volunteer computing paradigm. We evaluated the performance of DENIS by testing the effect of simulation length, task deadline, and batch size, on the time to complete a batch of simulations. In the experiments, the time to complete a batch of simulations did not increase with simulation length, and had little dependence on batch size. In a test case involving the generation of a population of models, DENIS was able to reduce the simulation time from years to a few days when compared to a stand-alone computer. Such capacity makes it possible to undertake large cardiac simulation projects without the need for high performance computing infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.