Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30325947›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Inhibitory attentional control in anxiety: Manipulating cognitive load in an antisaccade task.

Julian Basanovic, Lies Notebaert, Patrick J F Clarke, Colin MacLeod, Philippe Jawinski, Nigel T M Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julian BasanovicCentre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3686-8720
Lies NotebaertCentre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Patrick J F ClarkeSchool of Psychology, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.
Colin MacLeodCentre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Philippe JawinskiDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2994-3075
Nigel T M ChenSchool of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theorists have proposed that heightened anxiety vulnerability is characterised by reduced attentional control performance and have made the prediction in turn that elevating cognitive load will adversely impact attentional control performance for high anxious individuals to a greater degree than low anxious individuals. Critically however, existing attempts to test this prediction have been limited in their methodology and have presented inconsistent findings. Using a methodology capable of overcoming the limitations of previous research, the present study sought to investigate the effect of manipulating cognitive load on inhibitory attentional control performance of high anxious and low anxious individuals. High and low trait anxious participants completed an antisaccade task, requiring the execution of prosaccades towards, or antisaccades away from, emotionally toned stimuli while eye movements were recorded. Participants completed the antisaccade task under conditions that concurrently imposed a lesser cognitive load, or greater cognitive load. Analysis of participants' saccade latencies revealed high trait anxious participants demonstrated generally poorer inhibitory attentional control performance as compared to low trait anxious participants. Furthermore, conditions imposing greater cognitive load, as compared to lesser cognitive load, resulted in enhanced inhibitory attentional control performance across participants generally. Crucially however, analyses did not reveal an effect of cognitive load condition on anxiety-linked differences in inhibitory attentional control performance, indicating that elevating cognitive load did not adversely impact attentional control performance for high anxious individuals to a greater degree than low anxious individuals. Hence, the present findings are inconsistent with predictions made by some theorists and are in contrast to the findings of earlier investigations. These findings further highlight the need for research into the relationship between anxiety, attentional control, and cognitive load.

Indexed as

AttentionCognitionEye MovementsAdolescentAnxietyEye Movement MeasurementsFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMalePsychological TestsSaccades

Identifiers

PMID30325947
PMCPMC6191120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.