Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30325923›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2018

ProxECAT: Proxy External Controls Association Test. A new case-control gene region association test using allele frequencies from public controls.

Audrey E Hendricks, Stephen C Billups, Hamish N C Pike, I Sadaf Farooqi, Eleftheria Zeggini, Stephanie A Santorico, Inês Barroso, Josée Dupuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Integrated Germline and Somatic Molecular Profiling to Detect Cancer Predisposition Has a High Clinical Impact in Poor-Prognosis Pediatric Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Replication of a GWAS signal nearBlood neoplasia · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Audrey E HendricksMathematical and Statistical Sciences Department, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7152-0287
Stephen C BillupsMathematical and Statistical Sciences Department, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3627-0793
Hamish N C PikeHuman Medical Genetics and Genomics Program, University of Colorado-Denver, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
I Sadaf FarooqiUniversity of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7609-3504
Eleftheria ZegginiHuman Genetics, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Stephanie A SantoricoMathematical and Statistical Sciences Department, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, United States of America.
Inês BarrosoUniversity of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5800-4520
Josée DupuisDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2871-3603

Funding

Rare Sequence Variation and Diabetes Quantitative TraitsU01DK078616 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MEIGS, JAMES B · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK078616Wellcome Trust WT098051Wellcome Trust WT206194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A primary goal of the recent investment in sequencing is to detect novel genetic associations in health and disease improving the development of treatments and playing a critical role in precision medicine. While this investment has resulted in an enormous total number of sequenced genomes, individual studies of complex traits and diseases are often smaller and underpowered to detect rare variant genetic associations. Existing genetic resources such as the Exome Aggregation Consortium (>60,000 exomes) and the Genome Aggregation Database (~140,000 sequenced samples) have the potential to be used as controls in these studies. Fully utilizing these and other existing sequencing resources may increase power and could be especially useful in studies where resources to sequence additional samples are limited. However, to date, these large, publicly available genetic resources remain underutilized, or even misused, in large part due to the lack of statistical methods that can appropriately use this summary level data. Here, we present a new method to incorporate external controls in case-control analysis called ProxECAT (Proxy External Controls Association Test). ProxECAT estimates enrichment of rare variants within a gene region using internally sequenced cases and external controls. We evaluated ProxECAT in simulations and empirical analyses of obesity cases using both low-depth of coverage (7x) whole-genome sequenced controls and ExAC as controls. We find that ProxECAT maintains the expected type I error rate with increased power as the number of external controls increases. With an accompanying R package, ProxECAT enables the use of publicly available allele frequencies as external controls in case-control analysis.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsCase-Control StudiesComputer SimulationGene FrequencyGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansModels, GeneticPoisson Distribution

Identifiers

PMID30325923
PMCPMC6191077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.