ArticleBiopreservation and biobanking2018
Using Genomic Sequence Information to Increase Conservation and Sustainable Use of Crop Diversity and Benefit-Sharing.
Article in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Passports for Ex Situ Seed Donors: Enhanced Genetic Monitoring for Plant Conservation.Molecular ecology · 2026Review
- Tracing the global spread of maize (Zea mays L.) through plastome analysis of landraces.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Importance of timely metadata curation to the global surveillance of genetic diversity.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2023Article
- The genome of Lyophyllum shimeji provides insight into the initial evolution of ectomycorrhizal fungal genomes.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2023Article
- Supporting in situ conservation of the genetic diversity of crop wild relatives using genomic technologies.Molecular ecology · 2022Review
- Digitising biopiracy? The global governance of plant genetic resources in the age of digital sequencing information.Third world quarterly · 2022Article
- Farmers' Rights and Digital Sequence Information: Crisis or Opportunity to Reclaim Stewardship Over Agrobiodiversity?Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- The Future of Digital Sequence Information for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article describes how CGIAR centers and partners are using genomic sequence information to promote the conservation and sustainable use of crop genetic diversity, and to generate and share benefits derived from those uses. The article highlights combined institutional, and benefit-sharing-related challenges that need to be addressed to support expanded use of digital sequence information in agricultural research and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.