Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30325646›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2019

Current and future applications of 3D printing in congenital cardiology and cardiac surgery.

Elena Giulia Milano, Claudio Capelli, Jo Wray, Benedetta Biffi, Sofie Layton, Matthew Lee, Massimo Caputo, Andrew M Taylor, Silvia Schievano, Giovanni Biglino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elena Giulia Milano1 Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science & Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children , London , UK.
Claudio Capelli1 Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science & Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children , London , UK.
Jo Wray3 Cardiorespiratory Division, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
Benedetta Biffi1 Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science & Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children , London , UK.
Sofie Layton3 Cardiorespiratory Division, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
Matthew Lee4 Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Massimo Caputo4 Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Andrew M Taylor1 Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science & Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children , London , UK.
Silvia Schievano1 Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science & Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children , London , UK.
Giovanni Biglino4 Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/17/1/32804British Heart Foundation PG/15/33/31394British Heart Foundation PG/16/99/32572Department of Health PDF-2012-05-430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology in congenital cardiology and cardiac surgery has experienced a rapid development over the last decade. In presence of complex cardiac and extra-cardiac anatomies, the creation of a physical, patient-specific model is attractive to most clinicians. However, at the present time, there is still a lack of strong scientific evidence of the benefit of 3D models in clinical practice and only qualitative evaluation of the models has been used to investigate their clinical use. 3D models can be printed in rigid or flexible materials, and the original size can be augmented depending on the application the models are needed for. The most common applications of 3D models at present include procedural planning of complex surgical or interventional cases, in vitro simulation for research purposes, training and communication with patients and families. The aim of this pictorial review is to describe the basic principles of this technology and present its current and future applications.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresModels, AnatomicPrinting, Three-DimensionalCardiologyHeartHeart Defects, CongenitalHumans

Identifiers

PMID30325646
PMCPMC6404827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.